‘Harm management’: Congress on BJP chief Nadda distancing from Nishikant Dubey’s SC comment

The Congress on Sunday hit out on the Bharatiya Janata Social gathering (BJP) after the ruling celebration distanced itself from the criticism of the Supreme Courtroom by its MPs Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma.
“The distancing of the outgoing BJP President from the atrocious remarks made by 2 BJP MPs on the Chief Justice of India carries little which means. These MPs are repeat offenders in terms of hate speech and are fairly often utilized by G2 to assault communities, establishments, and people,” Congress common secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh mentioned on X.
“The outgoing BJP President’s clarification is nothing however harm management. It would idiot no one. That is Total Political Science reflecting itself as Total Political Hypocrisy,” Ramesh added.
ALSO READ: ‘Shut down Parliament if…’: Nishikant Dubey assaults SC; Congress MP hits again
Ramesh hit out at outgoing BJP president JP Nadda’s response to Dubey’s comment, saying,”However the outgoing BJP President is completely silent on equally unacceptable remarks on the judiciary which are regularly made by considered one of its very distinguished appointees to a excessive Constitutional place. What does he need to say about these remarks? Does the BJP subscribe to them?”
ALSO READ: Owaisi to BJP on Nishikant Dubey’s SC ‘inciting wars’ comment: ‘Tubelights’
Nishikant Dubey SC remarks row
Nishikant Dubey advised ANI,”There was an Article 377 during which homosexuality was an enormous crime. The Trump administration has mentioned that there are solely two sexes on this world, both male or feminine…Whether or not it’s Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Jain or Sikh, all consider that homosexuality is against the law. One high-quality morning, the Supreme Courtroom mentioned that we abolish this case,” Dubey advised ANI.
“Article 141 says that the legal guidelines we make, the judgments we give, are relevant from the decrease court docket to the Supreme Courtroom. Article 368 states that Parliament has the authority to enact all legal guidelines, and the Supreme Courtroom has the facility to interpret the regulation. The highest court docket is asking the President and Governor to inform what they need to do relating to the Payments. When the Ram Mandir, Krishna Janmabhoomi, or Gyanvapi challenge arises, you (SC) say, ‘Present us the paper’. Mughals ke aane ke baad jo Masjid banne hai unke liye keh raho ho paper kaha se dikhao,” he added.
Then again, BJP Rajya Sabha MP Dinesh Sharma had mentioned,”There’s a terror among the many public that when Dr BR Ambedkar wrote the Structure, the rights of the Legislative and Judiciary had been clearly written…In line with the Structure of India, nobody can direct the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The President has already given her assent to it. Nobody can problem the President, because the President is supreme.”
Nadda distanced himself from the remarks by Dubey, saying,”The Bharatiya Janata Social gathering has nothing to do with the statements made by BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma on the judiciary and the Chief Justice of the nation. These are their private statements, however the BJP neither agrees with nor helps such statements. The BJP fully rejects these statements.”