CLAT UG-2025: SC agrees to listen to plea difficult Delhi HC verdict | Training

CLAT UG-2025: SC agrees to listen to plea difficult Delhi HC verdict | Training

New Delhi, The Supreme Court docket on Wednesday agreed to listen to a plea difficult the Delhi Excessive Court docket’s verdict directing the Consortium of Nationwide Legislation Universities to revise the mark sheets and republish the ultimate checklist of chosen candidates of CLAT UG-2025 inside 4 weeks.

CLAT UG-2025: SC agrees to listen to plea difficult Delhi HC verdict

A bench of Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih issued notices to the consortium and others on the plea, searching for their replies inside per week.

The bench stated the matter can be heard once more after per week.

The Frequent Legislation Admission Check , 2025, for admissions to five-year LLB programs in nationwide legislation universities, was held on December 1 final 12 months and the outcomes had been declared on December 7. A number of pleas had been filed in numerous excessive courts, alleging that a number of questions within the examination had been fallacious.

CLAT determines admissions to undergraduate and postgraduate legislation programs in nationwide legislation universities within the nation.

On February 6, the Supreme Court docket transferred all petitions to the Delhi Excessive Court docket for a “constant adjudication”. The highest courtroom handed the route on the switch petitions of the Consortium of Nationwide Legislation Universities.

In its April 23 order, a division bench of the excessive courtroom accepted sure objections of the candidates whereas rejecting a few of them.

“We direct the respondent/consortium to revise the mark sheet and to republish/renotify the ultimate checklist of chosen candidates inside 4 weeks from the date,” the excessive courtroom stated.

It clarified that the consortium ought to apply the analysis to every appellant and petitioner and the candidates who may need tried sure questions underneath the courtroom’s consideration.

The consortium, the excessive courtroom stated, must also apply the analysis to all of the candidates to whom sure advantages could possibly be granted in view of the evaluation. The excessive courtroom disposed of the petitions and appeals declaring sure errors within the CLAT UG-2025 questionnaire.

The excessive courtroom is but to listen to pleas difficult the questions of CLAT PG-2025. The appeals had been filed by the aspirants and the consortium difficult a single choose’s order.

On December 20, 2024, a Delhi Excessive Court docket’s single choose bench directed the consortium to revise the results of CLAT-2025 over the errors within the reply key. The decision, which got here on the plea of a CLAT aspirant, dominated the reply decisions to 2 questions within the entrance take a look at had been fallacious.

The plea challenged the reply key revealed by the consortium on December 7, 2024, whereas searching for a route to declare appropriate solutions to sure questions. The one choose bench stated the errors had been “demonstrably clear” and “shutting a blind eye” would quantity to injustice.

Whereas the aspirant challenged the only choose’s order which refused his prayer over the opposite two questions, the consortium additionally moved the division bench of the Delhi Excessive Court docket towards the only choose’s choice.

On December 24, 2024, the division bench refused to move any interim order after prima facie discovering no error with the only choose’s order over the 2 questions and stated the consortium was free to declare the outcomes by way of the choose’s choice.

This text was generated from an automatic information company feed with out modifications to textual content.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *