‘It’s recreation over if…’: 59-year-old pushed to stop two years earlier than retirement after 22 years at firm

The publish, titled “Father is getting laid off at 59 however one thing appears sus,” was shared in a preferred profession recommendation discussion board and has since sparked intense discussions about office ethics and ageism.

In line with the consumer, the person had labored on the similar firm for 22 years and was initially scheduled to retire in January 2025. His household believed his job was safe, particularly after the corporate prolonged his tenure by two extra years—an indication, they thought, that his contributions had been nonetheless valued.

However occasions took a sudden and sudden flip final week.

“He was requested by his boss to ship a warning e mail to his reportee for continually underperforming,” the publish reads. “This reportee retaliates… by writing a really diplomatic mail and cc’ing his boss and superiors.”

What occurred subsequent shocked the household—and the web.

The publish alleges that as an alternative of backing the veteran worker, the corporate started siding with the junior employees member. The once-trusted worker immediately discovered himself blamed for inside points and was painted as the issue. Quickly after, the corporate cited “price range cuts,” “poor efficiency,” and “restructuring” as causes for his termination—with out providing severance.

Additionally learn: Jilted boyfriend throws grenade at ex-girlfriend’s home in Thailand, dies in blast

So as to add to the misery, the person’s boss allegedly started pressuring him to resign, presenting it because the “honourable” choice. However in response to the publish, doing so would strip him of any authorized protections or compensation.

“As soon as he resigns, it’s recreation over for him,” the consumer wrote, including that the corporate claimed he was “technically speculated to retire already” and thus not eligible for severance.

Check out the publish:

Many took to the feedback part to react.

“By no means ought to a resignation e mail be despatched. NO RESIGNATION,” one consumer suggested.

One other consumer echoed rising considerations about unfair labour practices, “Honor is overrated, ask him to not resign and assist them simply eliminate him. If he’s actually critical about leaving, greatest to ask for a buyout, pay 4 years wage and he’ll ‘contemplate it’.”

Some went additional, pointing to a bigger problem at play.

A consumer famous, “They’re slicing prices by eliminating skilled employees earlier than retirement payouts kick in. It’s ageism, plain and easy.”

“Noticed comparable factor occur to 1 individual in considered one of my previous org/staff the place 1 yr earlier than official resignation, he was requested to depart and be obtainable for work half time. this individual was founding member and a part of organisation for 16+ years,” wrote one consumer.

Additionally learn: ‘She appears to be like Indian’: Lady mocked for consuming with arms on London prepare, viral video ignites tradition struggle