Anna College Sexual Assault Case: Accused Discovered Responsible, Sentencing On June 2 | India Information
Almost 5 months after the sexual assault of a pupil contained in the Anna College campus, the Mahila Court docket in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, on Wednesday discovered the only accused, Gnanasekaran (37), responsible on 11 counts, together with rape.
The court docket, presided over by Choose M. Rajalakshmi, introduced that sentencing will likely be pronounced on June 2.
The cost sheet within the case was filed on February 24 by a Particular Investigation Workforce (SIT) that took over the probe from the Larger Chennai Police.
Gnanasekaran, a roadside biryani vendor and a DMK native chief with a recognized prison background, was initially arrested by the native police quickly after the incident.
In response to the prosecution, the incident befell on December 23, 2024, when the sufferer, a second-year engineering pupil, was spending time along with her male good friend on campus.
Gnanasekaran confronted the couple, threatened them with a fabricated video of them being intimate, and warned that he would share it with college officers to have them expelled.
He then coerced the boy into leaving and manipulated the lady into following him to a secluded a part of the campus. Pretending that the boy was being investigated by college workers, he additional intimidated the sufferer.
When she refused to conform along with his calls for, Gnanasekaran allegedly sexually assaulted her and recorded the act on his cell phone.
He later took her telephone quantity and blackmailed her, threatening to ship the video to her father and school authorities if she failed to fulfill him once more. Nonetheless, the lady demonstrated outstanding braveness by refusing to remain silent.
With the assist of her household and school authorities, she filed a criticism the very subsequent day on the Kotturpuram All Ladies Police Station. The swift motion by the police led to Gnanasekaran’s fast arrest.
Through the trial, his counsel pleaded for leniency in sentencing, citing private grounds. Nonetheless, the prosecution strongly objected, stressing the heinous nature of the crime and the lengthy historical past of prison offences attributed to the accused.
Choose Rajalakshmi, after listening to each side, reserved the pronouncement of sentence for June 2.
The decision has been hailed as a major step towards justice for the survivor and a robust message towards crimes focusing on girls on academic campuses.
