anye West calls to FREE Sean Diddy Combs; claims ‘Me too is a woke agenda’ in SHOCKING Twitter rant |

Kanye West has as soon as once more ignited controversy with an explosive Twitter rant on Saturday moring, calling for the discharge of music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs whereas additionally taking goal on the Me Too motion.
The rapper’s rant, crammed with inflammatory statements, sparked outrage throughout social media platforms.
In his tweets, West wrote, “Puff obtained me too’d So did I FREE PUFF Did Puff get me too’d explanation for the combating or due to the cash? I by no means seen a broke n**** get me too’d.”He continued his assault on the motion, labeling it a “woke agenda,” including, “Me too is a woke agenda.”

His most controversial assertion got here when he immediately denied the legitimacy of sexual assault allegations made below the motion, stating, “You b****** weren’t raped Pardon me Lemme put this in Ye all caps YOU ME TOO B****** DID NOT GET RAPED YOU EXTORTED N***** N***** MEANS MEN B****** MEANS B******.”
West ended his rant with a message, “HERE COMES THE THREATS FROM UNKNOWN NUMBERS.”

He additionally shared a screenshot of a message he obtained with somebody issuing a menace to him and his daughters. The publish has, nevertheless, been taken down.
The tweets have drawn widespread backlash, with many condemning his remarks as deeply insensitive. It stays to be seen whether or not West will face additional penalties for his newest outburst.

So far as Diddy is anxious, the rapper has pleaded not responsible to intercourse trafficking prices lodged in opposition to him after his September arrest. He stays incarcerated with out bail, awaiting a Might 5 trial.
Prosecutors mentioned Combs used the “energy and status” he wielded as a music mogul to intimidate, threaten and lure ladies into his orbit, usually below the pretence of a romantic relationship. The indictment mentioned he then used drive, threats and coercion to trigger victims, together with the three ladies, to interact in business intercourse acts.
Earlier this month, protection attorneys mentioned in court docket papers that the allegations described within the indictment had been a “sexist and puritanical” response by prosecutors to consensual intercourse acts between prepared adults.
They wrote that “the federal government’s concept perpetuates stereotypes of feminine victimhood and lack of company.”
They mentioned the federal government’s view depends upon the characterization of the intercourse performances as “soiled, disgusting, or inherently unsavoury” and reveals that the federal government “seeks to police non-conforming sexual exercise and that it assumes — regardless of all proof on the contrary — {that a} girl’s prepared participation will need to have been coerced.”