Are all arrests vitiated if cops don’t give grounds of arrest? SC reserves order

A bench comprising justices Bhushan R Gavai and justice AG Masih was confronted with this query whereas contemplating an enchantment filed by Mihir Shah, the accused within the Worli BMW hit-and-run case in July 2024, the place a girl was crushed underneath the wheels resulting in her demise whereas her husband survived the incident.

Shah claimed that he was not provided with grounds of arrest both earlier than his arrest or on the time he was taken into custody on July 9 final 12 months. He argued that this went in opposition to the Supreme Court docket judgments in Pankaj Bansal case (2023) which held that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) was sure to offer written grounds of arrest to the accused arrested underneath the Prevention of Cash Laundering Act (PMLA). This rule was additional prolonged to offences underneath the Illegal Actions Prevention Act (UAPA) by the highest court docket in Prabir Purkayastha case (Could 2024) because the Delhi police had not provided the NewsClick founder with the grounds of arrest.

ALSO READ | SC places safeguards in GST, Customs arrests

Shah was arrested on July 9 final 12 months, two days after he allegedly rammed his BMW right into a two-wheeler in Worli, killing 45-year-old lady Kaveri Nakhwa and leaving her husband Pradeep injured. His driver Bidawat, who was additionally current within the automotive on the time of the accident, was arrested on the day of the incident. Mihir Shah’s father and former Shiv Sena chief Rajesh Shah had additionally been arrested within the case, however was later granted bail.

“The query we’re known as upon to reply is whether or not in each case, together with offences underneath the IPC, it is going to be essential to furnish grounds of arrest to the accused, both earlier than arrest or forthwith after arrest,” the bench stated.

One other problem which arises is that in sure instances, on account of exigencies, if it isn’t potential to furnish grounds of arrest, whether or not arrest might be vitiated underneath part 50 of the Code of Felony Process (CrPC) which states that each police officer arresting any particular person with out warrant “shall forthwith talk to him full particulars of the offence for which he’s arrested or different grounds for such arrest.”

The court docket reserved its verdict on Shah’s petition whereas making it clear that it’s going to not intrude with the Bombay excessive court docket order upholding Shah’s arrest negating his plea of non-supply of grounds of arrest citing that he had full information of his crime.

The court docket noticed that the accused couldn’t be allowed to unduly make the most of Supreme Court docket judgments attempting to tell apart regular crimes underneath IPC from these underneath PMLA, and so on. “It’s the most inhuman factor. He dragged the girl and didn’t have the courtesy to get her medical assist,” the bench stated, referring to the costs in opposition to Shah.

ALSO READ | Grounds of arrest to accused: We wish to strike steadiness, says SC

“In IPC, any person is accused of a direct offence and there are witnesses for a similar. Not like in PMLA, the place the arrest is predicated on a predicate offence and so it’s insisted to provide grounds of arrest… We wish to strike a steadiness as we don’t need any accused to make the most of our observations and get launched,” the court docket stated.

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi showing for Shah submitted, “Laborious instances mustn’t result in laying down of unhealthy legislation,” as he highlighted the constitutional safeguard offered by the highest court docket in its previous ruling underlining the necessity for supplying grounds of arrest.

Advocate Shri Singh aiding the court docket as amicus curiae identified {that a} distinction should be made between common crimes and crimes underneath particular statutes. Usually crimes, he stated, whereas provide of grounds of arrest could also be insisted upon, the identical shouldn’t be deadly in order to vitiate arrest.

The court docket gave an occasion the place an individual kills 10 individuals and insists on grounds of arrest earlier than being taken into custody. Singhvi stated that even in a homicide case, to insist that no grounds of arrest might be offered is a “pernicious” precept, at the same time as he distinguished that this will likely not apply to those that stay absconding after committing a criminal offense.

The bench additionally went on to grant bail to 2 accused in separate instances tagged with Mihir Shah’s case. Whereas accused in a single case associated to a business transaction, the opposite accused was Shivani Agarwal, the mom of the teenager accused within the Pune Porsche crash case in Could final 12 months. She was accused of fabricating proof to protect her son within the incident which claimed two lives.