BPSC row: No interim reduction from HC, however PT outcome to be subject material of ultimate end result of petition | Schooling
Patna Excessive Courtroom on Thursday heard petition demanding re-test of the seventieth mixed aggressive examination in view of alleged irregularities filed by college students backed by Jan Suraj Social gathering of Prashant Kishor for round 80 minutes and refused to remain the outcome, however made it clear within the order that “any results of the preliminary examination, carried out by the Fee, would be the subject material of the ultimate end result of this petition”.
After listening to the petitions within the first half, the single-judge bench of Justice Arvind Singh Chandel reserved the order, which got here within the night. The court docket has mounted January 31 as the subsequent date of listening to.
The court docket has sought counter affidavit on all of the factors raised within the petition from the BPSC by January 30. There have been 14 petitioners within the case.
“At this stage, I’m not inclined to grant any interim reduction, as prayed by the petitioners. The senior counsel for the respondents are directed to file detailed parawise counter affidavit on or earlier than January 30, 2025,” stated the bench.
Odisha constitutes 16 member panel to develop curriculum framework below NEP 2020
“It’s made clear that any results of the preliminary examination, carried out by the Fee, would be the subject material of the ultimate end result of this petition,” it added.
Earlier, the counsel for the petitioners argued that the query paper had been leaked, a number of candidates weren’t given the query papers, a day previous to the examination, the Fee modified the middle of candidates, separate exams have been held on two completely different dates and the questions papers have been additionally circulated on social media X.
The counsel additionally submitted that the irregularities aren’t solely confined to the Bapu Pariksha Parisar but in addition incurred at about 28 completely different examination facilities which was reported by the candidates who appeared on these examination facilities.nevertheless, the counsel for the BPSC opposed the arguments.
The petition was filed on Thursday below Article 226, searching for re-test of the BPSC examination and embargo on publication of outcome until the re-test is held. Article 226 of the Structure of India provides Excessive Courts the facility to subject instructions, orders or writs (habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorar) to any individual or authority, together with the federal government, throughout the court docket’s jurisdiction to implement elementary and non-fundamental rights supplied below Half III of the Structure, or for another goal.The case was talked about on Friday final.
