CBSE Class 12 Physics paper evaluation: What lecturers take into consideration the examination held at this time

Surender Puli, PGT Physics Vidyagyan College, Sitapur mentioned it was a lengthy-paper with set 3 being notably intensive.

“The multiple-choice questions (MCQs) have been fairly tough and posed a major problem. Part E, consisting of five-mark questions, was comparatively easy however required appreciable time to finish, much like the three-mark questions in Part C. In Part B, just a few two-mark questions have been reasonably tough and demanded a deeper stage of conceptual understanding.”

His pupil Geeta mentioned, “In set 2, Part B was barely prolonged, and Part C targeted on concept-based questions, which I loved. General, the paper was reasonable, and I’m anticipating good marks.”

Additionally learn: CBSE Class 10 Science Examination 2025: Tough for some, reasonable for others, this is how college students and educators react publish examination

Tushar Goel, PGT Physics at Silverline Status College, Ghaziabad, mentioned the CBSE Class 12 Physics paper was balanced, and it successfully assessed college students’ understanding of key ideas and talent to use them.

“The paper coated many matters from the syllabus, with a mixture of conceptual questions, derivations, and numerical issues”

“The paper sampled numerous matters, guaranteeing college students could not depend on just some areas. The questions have been usually well-written and simple to know, lowering the possibility of misinterpretations,” he added.

Goel general discovered the paper moderately well-constructed for a good analysis of pupil studying.

Yogita Sharma, PGT Physics, KIIT World College, Gurgaon, shared her in-depth evaluation of the CBSE Class 12 Physics paper. She mentioned it adopted the sample of the pattern paper offered by the board and had 5 sections – A, B, C, D and E.

Part A contained 16 MCQs of 1 mark every; Part B contained 5 questions of two marks every; Part C contained 7 questions of three marks every; Part D contained 2 case study-based questions of 4 marks every; and Part E contained 3 lengthy questions of 5 marks every, Sharma mentioned.

She rated the paper reasonably tough which had a “well-structured sample guaranteeing conceptual readability, problem-solving potential, and application-based studying.”

Sharma mentioned numerical questions have been manageable, however some required prolonged calculations, making time administration an important issue.

Additionally learn: CBSE to launch draft on board examinations twice a yr quickly

“Derivations and case-study questions have been conceptual, rewarding college students who had practised NCERT examples and former yr’s questions. The paper was well-balanced throughout all units, sustaining equity in query distribution.”

Right here is the section-wise evaluation by Yogita Sharma

Part A: Effectively-balanced with a mixture of conceptual, calculation-based questions, offering in-depth evaluation by way of assertion-reasoning questions.

Part B: Software-based numericals required an intensive understanding of Ohm’s Regulation, Ampere’s Circuital Regulation, and Lenz’s Regulation.

Part C: Most time-consuming. Included derivations, circuit-based questions, and conceptual reasoning. Matters reminiscent of Capacitors, Kirchhoff’s Legal guidelines, and Ray Optics featured detailed derivation-based questions.

Part D: Case-study questions targeted on real-life purposes of Capacitors, Semiconductor Electronics. Required analytical and conceptual understanding.

Part E: Direct questions from Present Electrical energy, Magnetism, and Optics, together with numerical issues that required a robust conceptual basis. Some numerical issues concerned prolonged calculations.