ClAT 2025 Outcomes: Delhi HC divison bench refuses to remain single bench order asking CNLU to announce revised outcomes | Aggressive Exams
Dec 24, 2024 01:06 PM IST
Delhi Excessive Courtroom division bench opined that the one decide has examined the 2 questions fastidiously & has discovered {that a} totally different view isn’t a believable one.
On Tuesday, the Delhi Excessive Courtroom division bench refused to remain an order of the one decide bench directing the Consortium of Nationwide Regulation Universities to announce revised outcomes of the lately held Widespread Regulation Admission Take a look at (CLAT) 2025 undergraduate examination after altering the award of marks for 2 questions.
A bench of appearing Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela have been of the opinion that prima facie, there isn’t any error within the single decide’s choice of discovering the 2 solutions as “demonstrably fallacious” and has reached a conclusion based mostly on cautious consideration. “Prima facie We discover no error within the choice find two of the solutions within the query as demonstrably fallacious. The one decide has examined the 2 questions fastidiously and has discovered {that a} totally different view isn’t a believable one. Prima facie, we concur with the one decide,” the bench mentioned. The bench added, “You (NLU consortium) can go forward with the outcomes. There isn’t a interim order handed in that. We make clear that there isn’t any keep order & pendency of this petition isn’t construed as inserting a cloud on the outcomes, which can be reworked as per the one decide order.”
On December 20, the Delhi Excessive Courtroom directed the Consortium of Nationwide Regulation Universities (Consortium) to announce revised outcomes for the CLAT 2025 undergraduate examination after making corrections within the marking of two questions.
A bench headed by Justice Jyoti Singh ordered the Consortium to rectify errors in questions 14 and 100 of Set A, stating that the errors have been “demonstrably clear.” The court docket noticed that ignoring these errors would quantity to injustice for the candidates.
In an in depth 29-page judgment, Justice Singh instructed the Consortium to award marks to all candidates who chosen possibility C for query 14 in Set A and to exclude query 100 from the analysis.
The ruling got here in response to a plea filed by Aditya Singh, a 17-year-old candidate who appeared for the examination. Singh challenged the ultimate reply key launched by CLAT, arguing that errors within the reply key had adversely affected his rank and, consequently, his possibilities of securing admission to a extra prestigious establishment. Singh’s petition additionally sought the structure of an knowledgeable committee to assessment the objections he had raised relating to the reply keys.
Get newest information on…
See extra
