‘Critical errors’ in SSC analysis a blot on the federal government, say pupil organisations

‘Critical errors’ in SSC analysis a blot on the federal government, say pupil organisations

Leaders of pupil organisations have slammed the TDP-led coalition authorities for “severe errors” within the analysis of SSC reply sheets, and have accused it of failing the scholar neighborhood.

All India Scholar Federation (AISF) State vice-president Sai Kumar mentioned, within the haste to launch the SSC ends in file time and acquire mileage out of it, the individuals dealing with the analysis activity misplaced focus and delivered inaccurate outcomes.

He mentioned, for the primary time in historical past, as many as 66,363 college students utilized for re-evaluation and, out of them, over 11,000, who had been earlier declared failed, now handed. Their proportion of marks additionally considerably elevated.

Stating that the wrong outcomes brought about immense disappointment to many college students, he mentioned there have been reviews of some distraught college students making an attempt suicide.

Mr. Sai Kumar mentioned it was unlucky that regardless of such gross mistake, HRD Minister Nara Lokesh had not made any assertion on the difficulty thus far.

Scholar Federation of India State president P. Rammohan Rao and secretary Okay. Prasanna Kumar accused the federal government of discovering scapegoats in lecturers for its personal failures.

They alleged that the authorities had been in a rush to start Intermediate lessons in favour of the company establishments. They mentioned drifting from the standard apply of allocating 15 days’ time for completion of analysis, the federal government introduced strain on lecturers to wind up in every week, resulting in the errors.

Citing examples, they mentioned a pupil named Mokshitha secured 21 marks in Social Research initially, however scored 84 after re-evaluation, one other pupil from Bapatla scored 23 marks in Social Research, however secured 96 after re-evaluation, and in Eluru, a pupil wrote a 14-page reply, however solely eight pages had been evaluated.

Stating that the scholars suffered immensely as a result of authorities’s negligence, they demanded that motion in opposition to lecturers ought to be dropped and the re-evaluation charges collected from college students ought to be refunded.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *