Decide denies authorities’s request to unseal grand jury materials in Ghislaine Maxwell case

Washington — A federal choose on Monday denied a request from the Trump administration to unseal grand jury materials within the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime affiliate of late intercourse offender Jeffrey Epstein who’s serving a 20-year sentence for intercourse trafficking, saying there’s nothing within the grand jury document that might shed new gentle on the case.

Decide Paul Engelmayer of the U.S. District Court docket for the Southern District of New York rejected the Justice Division’s bid to unveil the fabric in a 31-page order Monday morning. In courtroom filings, Justice Division legal professionals argued the circumstances of the Maxwell case warranted the discharge of the grand jury transcripts and displays, which generally stay secret. Engelmayer rejected that argument.

“The Authorities’s invocation of particular circumstances, nevertheless, fails on the threshold,” Engelmayer wrote. “Its total premise — that the Maxwell grand jury supplies would carry to gentle significant new details about Epstein’s and Maxwell’s crimes, or the Authorities’s investigation into them — is demonstrably false.”

In July, the Justice Division requested the judges overseeing the Maxwell and Epstein instances to launch the grand jury materials that shaped the idea for the federal prices in opposition to them, a transfer that got here amid uproar over the division’s overview of the so-called “Epstein recordsdata” and determination to not launch further paperwork within the authorities’s possession. 

CBS Information has reached out to Maxwell’s authorized workforce for remark. Maxwell is constant to contest her 2021 conviction.

Her attorneys argued in opposition to the Justice Division’s try to unseal the testimony and displays, writing that their consumer had “no alternative however to respectfully oppose” the discharge.

In quite a few courtroom filings main as much as Engelmayer’s determination, the Justice Division acknowledged that the grand jury transcripts, containing testimony from solely two legislation enforcement officers, have been principally already made public throughout Epstein and Maxwell’s courtroom proceedings. 

Engelmayer wrote that after a courtroom overview of the grand jury materials, he discovered the discharge would “not reveal new info of any consequence.”

“They don’t talk about or establish any consumer of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s. They don’t reveal any heretofore unknown means or strategies of Epstein’s or Maxwell’s crimes,” Engelmayer wrote. “They don’t reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They don’t reveal new sources of their wealth. They don’t discover the circumstances of Epstein’s dying. They don’t reveal the trail of the Authorities’s investigation.”

“Insofar because the movement to unseal implies that the grand jury supplies are an untapped mine lode of undisclosed details about Epstein or Maxwell or confederates, they definitively are usually not that,” Engelmayer continued, criticizing the Trump administration for its “disingenuous” justification for unsealing the paperwork.

“A member of the general public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury supplies don’t contribute something to public data, may conclude that the Authorities’s movement for his or her unsealing was aimed not at ‘transparency’ however at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure however on the phantasm of such,” he wrote.