Did goofy speak between a married California couple mimicking cartoon characters result in homicide?

This story beforehand aired on July 2, 2016.

Seven years after she shot her husband of their suburban lounge, Linda Duffey Gwozdz was in a Los Angeles County courtroom denying, as strongly as she might, that she is a murderess.

“This was a horrible accident,” she cried in courtroom, along with her late husband’s family trying on. “I want and pray continuously that I might be capable to take away your ache, however I can not.”

This case is just not a whodunit; it is extra of a why’d she do it? Linda admitted she shot her husband, Patrick Duffey, in 2007, however she mentioned it was an terrible, and unlikely, accident. She has needed to persuade authorities that reality will be stranger than fiction, as a result of her authorized protection has featured, amongst different issues, a solid of cartoon characters.

Her lawyer used the phrases of Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd to elucidate her actions as he insisted she is harmless.

Linda talked to police voluntarily and with out a lawyer simply hours after the taking pictures:

Linda Duffey to police: It was pointed down … and the following assume I do know, his head was proper there! … he was simply laying there!

Shaun McCarthy and Shannon Laren are veteran murder detectives with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Division for 13 years. Forgive the cliché, however they actually did assume they’d just about seen all of it.

Then, on April 26, 2007, they acquired a name a couple of taking pictures on the Duffey’s home in suburban Whittier:

Linda Duffey to 911: My husband was gonna go taking pictures … and I unintentionally shot him. We’d like assist.

911 operator: OK, keep on the road with me ma’am …

The detectives discovered Patrick Duffey lifeless on the sofa; his left hand was in his pocket.

“And his proper knee was being supported by a pillow. Very comfy, relaxed,” Sgt. Laren instructed “48 Hours” correspondent Richard Schlesinger.

There was blood pooled on the ground and splattered on the wall.

“There was a reasonably good sized blood puddle…” Laren mentioned, pointing to the ground on the finish of the sofa the place Patrick Duffey’s head rested.

“Clearly he had a gunshot wound to the top,” mentioned Lt. McCarthy.

The couple’s two teenage sons, Sean and Thomas, have been in school, so Linda was the one surviving witness. Det. Laren had a humorous feeling.

“It regarded like he’d been sleeping on the sofa,” he mentioned, “and any individual simply walked up and shot him in his sleep.”

“I used to be leaning … that this was an accident,” mentioned McCarthy.

Detective McCarthy has been investigating murder instances for about 13 years and is aware of how you can spot even the tiniest clues. He noticed little or no that made him suspicious.

“Did you guys disagree often on instances?” Schlesinger requested the detectives.

“I disagree with all of my companions on each case,” McCarthy replied.

“How does that work?” Schlesinger requested.

“I feel we sort of wait till we have now extra info,” mentioned Laren.

“I needed to listen to her story,” mentioned McCarthy.

“She was very entertaining … cherished to inform tales,” mentioned Julie Prendergast, who has been listening to Linda’s tales since they first grew to become associates in a school music program within the Eighties.

“She mentioned, ‘Effectively, really I am from Eire,” Prendergast mentioned. “And he or she began speaking with what I believed was a reasonably phony accent. …That was my first indication that Linda was a bit bit totally different.”

Prendergast mentioned Linda may very well be irreverent, even goofy.

“I’d … say, ‘Linda … I am gonna let you know one thing and also you’re gonna wish to giggle, however we’re in school proper now so do not giggle out loud.’ And it will simply come out anyway,” she mentioned.

After they left college the 2 associates ended up working on the identical place. And at some point, Prendergast mentioned, Linda known as with some information.

“She mentioned, ‘I am so excited. I am getting married, and I would such as you to be in my wedding ceremony!'” she mentioned.

The groom was a person Linda had met 4 years earlier: Patrick Duffey, a radio engineer, gun fanatic, and personal pilot.

“She simply mentioned it was like her dream come true and he or she could not be happier,” mentioned Prendergast.

Patrick’s sister, Katherine Hunt, mentioned he and Linda have been soul mates and playmates.

“They appeared blissful as a household. …They perceive one another,” she defined. “They have been kidding with one another, joking with one another.”

Linda Duffey to police: We’re simply at all times simply joking round with one another and fooling around and having a very good time…

And it was that silliness that grew to become a cornerstone of Linda’s story when she defined to police what occurred the day she killed her husband:

Linda Duffey to police: And I got here into the household room and he was sitting on the couch…

She mentioned that they had simply come again from a physician’s appointment. Patrick had continual circulation issues. Linda mentioned he’d been planning to go to the taking pictures vary. His .38, one in all three revolvers he stored in the home, was close by.

Linda Duffey to police: We hold it on this little locked field…

Linda instructed police she often stayed away from the weapons. However that day, she picked up the .38.

“And the story acquired stranger because it went on,” mentioned McCarthy.

Linda Duffey to police: We do that little foolish factor. We at all times sort of relate little foolish conversations to, like, cartoons that we have seen once we have been youthful and stuff. And he does this foolish little Elmer Fudd voice: “No extra buwwets.”

“And he or she claims she mentioned to him, ‘No extra buwwets?’ in Elmer’s Fudd’s voice,” McCarthy defined. “And he or she mentioned his response was, ‘No extra buwwets.'”

Linda mentioned it was a sport they performed on a regular basis. And when her husband mentioned ‘no extra bullets’ in his Elmer Fudd voice, she took it to imply the gun was empty; that it was secure to strive one thing Patrick had taught her.

“She mentioned that she then needed to impress him by exhibiting him she will be able to shoot it cowboy model,” mentioned McCarthy.

It is known as fan firing, and any fan of westerns is aware of it; you maintain the set off down and hold pulling again the hammer so the gun fires rapidly.

Linda Duffey to police: He instructed me there was no bullets within the gun.

She mentioned as soon as she began fan firing, she could not cease in time to keep away from hitting her husband, who leaned into the road of fireside.

Linda Duffey to police [crying]: …and the following factor I do know he —his head was proper there.

“The assertion in regards to the fan firing, it simply did not sound correct,” mentioned Laren.

However his associate, Lt. McCarthy, who had heard his share of loopy explanations from suspected killers, listened to that panicked 911 tape, listened to Linda’s story and concluded the story was simply wacky sufficient to be true.

“The overwhelming feeling that I acquired from her was she was odd at greatest and eccentric at worst,” he mentioned.

After the detectives interviewed Linda for an hour, they let her go house.

“Once you left work that day did you’ve in your thoughts that she was a suspect?” Schlesinger requested McCarthy.

“No,” he replied.

His intestine instructed him Linda was harmless, however he’d want extra. He’d want science.

IS FACT STRANGER THAN FICTION?

When he first studied the scene the place Linda Duffey killed her husband, Det. Shaun McCarthy was fairly certain it was an accident. He believed her story that she had reenacted their favourite Bugs Bunny cartoon after which fan fired the gun.

And when he talked to Linda later that day, she mentioned nothing that made him doubt her:

Lt. McCarthy: Begin with once you acquired up this morning

Linda Duffey: It’s my fault.

Lt. McCarthy: No, it isn’t your fault. … it is simply that we have to perceive …

Detectives Laren and McCarthy have been starting to know extra about what occurred contained in the Duffey house, particularly after they talked to the medical expert, who had simply accomplished an post-mortem on Patrick Duffey.

“There was a second gunshot wound,” mentioned McCarthy.

Linda Duffey claimed this was an accident, however she had shot her husband within the head not as soon as, however twice. Imagine it or not, even seasoned investigators can miss that sort of clue on the crime scene.

“You might not see the second gunshot wound?” Schlesinger requested.

“As a result of dry blood and the quantity of blood and coagulated blood … we weren’t aware about the second gunshot wound,” mentioned McCarthy.

“What did you make of that?” Schlesinger requested.

“Effectively, it is — it definitely was a crimson flag,” McCarthy replied.

Nevertheless it was not only a crimson flag for McCarthy’s associate, Shannon Laren. It was extra like a brilliant crimson arrow pointing proper at Linda Duffey.

“There was so many extremely inconceivable occasions that will’ve needed to have all lined up for this to really have been an accident,” he defined. “They did not line up.”

Nonetheless, McCarthy was not satisfied. “Why did not you simply say this has acquired to be homicide?” Schlesinger requested.

“As a result of I wanted to be satisfied myself that this was homicide,” McCarthy replied. “The very last thing on the planet I wanna do is ship an … harmless individual to jail for the remainder of their lives.”

It wasn’t sufficient for McCarthy to know what occurred. He needed to know why it occurred.

“We struggled to discover a compelling motive. And we regarded. And we regarded. And we regarded,” he mentioned.

However they could not actually discover one. The Duffeys gave the impression to be a mean center class household residing within the Los Angeles suburbs. There was a life insurance coverage coverage on Patrick, however they’d purchased it a long time earlier. There was no proof of dishonest. And contemplating her persona, McCarthy could not simply dismiss Linda’s story.

“It is like, ‘OK, perhaps this might’ve occurred the way in which she says, ‘trigger she’s so quirky and eccentric,” he mentioned.

Nevertheless it was about to get a bit more durable for McCarthy to consider Linda’s story due to Tracy Peck, a firearms professional for the sheriff’s division who was introduced into the case by McCarthy and Laren.

Keep in mind, in accordance with Linda, she fired the way in which they did within the films. It’s attainable to do this fairly simply — with the proper of gun.

The weapons used within the cowboy films have been single-action weapons. You may simply hold firing rapidly by pulling and releasing the hammer whereas the set off is held again.

“When the hammer is fanned, the cylinder will rotate with any such gun. So it is going to fireplace the cartridges within the chambers of the cylinder as its being fanned,” Peck demonstrated.

The Duffeys had two single-action revolvers in the home. However the gun Linda used to shoot her husband was not one in all them. It was a double-action revolver — and there is a massive distinction.

“The shooter merely pulls the set off, which accomplishes each cocking the hammer and releasing the hammer. And the gun will fireplace,” Peck demonstrated.

To fast fireplace a double-action revolver, the shooter has to do all types of issues on the proper time and in the proper sequence.

Requested if that kind of gun is designed to be fired that approach, Peck mentioned, “No.”

“For the needs of this case, I primarily invented a approach wherein I’d conceivably fan this. That included pulling the set off, releasing the set off, fanning the hammer, pulling the set off, releasing the set off, and fanning the hammer, however doing it fairly rapidly,” Peck demonstrated.

And Peck mentioned it is very onerous to purpose whereas doing all that. She mentioned the surprising, deafening noise of the gun, and the recoil, would have alarmed Linda if she did not know the gun was loaded.

In accordance with Peck, it will have been subsequent to inconceivable for Linda, who claimed to be an novice, to shoot her husband twice, quickly accidentally — particularly because the wounds have been so shut collectively.

“I do not discover it a really plausible story,” she instructed Schlesinger.

“I nonetheless needed to consider her,” McCarthy mentioned of Linda. “Nevertheless it clearly could not have gone down the way in which that she mentioned it went down.”

By now, Detective McCarthy was all however sure that Patrick Duffey’s dying was no accident, however the two detectives felt they did not have sufficient to show it. Due to a heavy workload — it took two years — however in January 2009, McCarthy and Laren introduced Linda again in for one more chat.

The dialog was recorded:

Linda Duffey to police: He confirmed me how you can do it actually quick. He goes, “You gotta do it just like the cowboys.”

“Effectively, within the second interview — I feel we have been each satisfied that this was a homicide,” mentioned McCarthy.

The detectives confirmed her a video of Tracy Peck fan firing the gun.

“I feel she was definitely shocked once we defined to her how troublesome it will be,” McCarthy mentioned. “I might inform the sunshine bulb went on in her mind. And he or she mentioned… I gotta at the very least change the story a bit bit.”

Linda now mentioned she and her husband had practiced fan firing with an unloaded revolver for years:

Linda Duffey to police: Possibly like, yeah, 15, 20 occasions.

Requested if he believed her this time, McCarthy instructed Schlesinger, “No.”

However the detectives needed to present Linda one final probability to point out them how she fired the gun. They made her an uncommon supply.

“Meet us on the vary. We’ll convey an actual duplicate and present us how one can fireplace this gun within the method that you simply mentioned,” mentioned McCarthy.

The detectives have been sure Linda wouldn’t kill once more, so that they let her go house once more and waited to listen to from her about their supply. Days become weeks, then months, and life went on on the murder bureau.

“We modified companions,” Det. Laren mentioned. “And when that occurs, you begin getting new instances. …And different instances begin falling by way of the wayside.”

Because the years handed, Linda may need thought she was off the hook, however her previous was about meet up with her.

“The district lawyer mentioned, ‘I am gonna file this case. And it is advisable to go get her,'” mentioned McCarthy.

A NEW LOOK AT THE CASE

With no information for practically 5 years, Patrick Duffey’s brother, John, and sister, Katherine Hunt, thought the police had determined his dying was an accident and had closed the investigation. However Hunt mentioned she had a tough time believing what Linda instructed her when she known as on that terrible day.

“She was incoherent,” Hunt recalled. “And I mentioned, ‘What occurred?’ ‘He was cleansing his gun, and it unintentionally went off.'”

Linda instructed police that she had shot Patrick accidentally, however later that night time she instructed his siblings he’d shot himself.

“May you image him having that sort of an accident? ” Schlesinger requested Hunt.

“No, completely not,” she replied. “We have been raised with weapons.”

“And we have been taught to empty our … weapons earlier than even coming into the home. And that was just like the primary rule,” mentioned John Duffey.

“It was onerous to consider that he had accomplished one thing like that,” mentioned Hunt.

And Hunt realized she was proper the day after Patrick died, when she met Linda on the funeral house.

“I mentioned, ‘The place was he shot?’ And he or she went like this. Identical to that,” she mentioned, tapping the highest of her head. “That is when it hit me that he did not shoot himself… I mentioned, ‘So inform me what actually occurred’ … she mentioned, ‘Oh, you are gonna hate me, you are gonna hate me.’ … I mentioned, ‘No, I am not gonna hate you, however I have to know what the reality is.’ …And I mentioned, ‘Did you shoot my brother within the head?’ And he or she mentioned, ‘Sure.'”

It was there, within the funeral house the place Hunt first heard the story of Elmer Fudd.

“Pat had instructed her, ‘No bullets.’ Like, ‘No buwwets,’ like — like Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd, as a result of they’d speak in cartoon characters typically,” Hunted laughed. “She thought the gun wasn’t loaded, and it went off. …I could not fairly perceive why she had lied. If it was an accident, it was an accident. However she had lied to us.”

However police nonetheless needed to show she had lied to them about why she shot him. Detectives had interrogated her twice, and launched her twice. The second time they let her go they’d made that uncommon supply to satisfy her on the firing vary.

“We even instructed her, ‘it may be at your comfort,'” mentioned McCarthy.

They weren’t shocked once they did not hear again from her and a number of other months later they stopped by the Duffey’s home and noticed a “For Sale” signal. Her sons have been house.

“And so they mentioned … ‘She’s on her honeymoon in Italy,'” mentioned McCarthy.

Two years after the taking pictures, Linda Duffey was Linda Gwozdz — newly married to Lawrence Gwozdz, a world class saxophone participant.

“After we Googled him, he was taking part in in Carnegie Corridor,” mentioned McCarthy.

And as soon as once more when wedding ceremony bells rang, so did Julie Prendergast’s telephone.

“She requested me would I sing in that wedding ceremony. And I mentioned, ‘What?'” Prendergast mentioned. “‘Linda, I am not coming to your wedding ceremony. …one thing’s not proper, surrounding the dying of Patrick.'”

Prendergast mentioned she was uneasy with how Linda simply moved on.

“She dyed her hair blonde. She was sporting totally different model of garments. She gave the impression to be strolling on air, on clouds, like oh, simply as blissful as will be,” she mentioned.

A 12 months after taking pictures her first husband, Linda met Gwozdz on-line. She moved to Mississippi the place her new husband was a music professor. She was out of sight, however for detectives Shannon Laren and Shaun McCarthy, she was not out of thoughts.

“Did you neglect about this case? Was there a time period the place -” Schlesinger requested the detectives.

“Oh, no. Completely not,” Lt. McCarthy replied.

When their workload with their new companions permitted, McCarthy and Laren every turned their consideration again to Linda. They needed to take a brand new take a look at the blood proof with a brand new professional, Paul Delhauer. He studied the photographs and police reviews and concluded Linda needed to be mendacity. Primarily based on her statements, police believed Linda was claiming that she had fired rapidly and from the identical spot.

“She moved and the — the relative place of the gun to the top modified,” mentioned Delhauer.

Standing subsequent to the sofa the place Duffey died, Delhauer mentioned the blood proof instructed him quite a bit — particularly the tiny stains on Linda’s clothes and the partitions, known as spatter, which he says got here from the primary shot.

“The barrel needs to be inside about three inches of the top in an effort to produce the spatter,” he defined.

Delhauer mentioned the second shot created a big pool of blood on the ground — within the actual spot the place Linda mentioned she was standing.

“…she would’ve been getting jets of blood hitting her,” Delhauer identified.

Requested if Linda had any blood on her, Laren mentioned, “Little or no. Very, little or no.”

Police thought they now had proof that Linda was mendacity — she did not have sufficient blood on her after the taking pictures to help her story. Laren and McCarthy thought they knew what actually occurred.

“She took purpose, fired one spherical whereas he was sleeping … realized he wasn’t lifeless … comes again heading in the right direction, fires the second spherical, and that is why they’re inside two inches of one another,” mentioned McCarthy.

They consider Patrick’s dying wasn’t an accident; it was an execution. By 2012, the brand new prosecutor assigned to the case was keen to maneuver forward. And police started speaking to Linda’s co-workers.

“Boy, that was very revealing,” McCarthy mentioned. “They constantly talked about how … she was so charming. However then as time went on, they began discovering out that she was this compulsive liar.”

And Julie Prendergast had a number of tales to inform about her one-time good friend’s report when it got here to telling the reality.

“All of us have one gallbladder. Linda had hers eliminated 3 times,” Prendergast mentioned. “Linda simply at all times wanted — appeared to wish to have consideration.”

It was sufficient for McCarthy. “I grew to become completely satisfied that we have to prosecute her,” he mentioned.

Lastly in Might 2012, 5 years after Patrick Duffey’s dying, Lt. McCarthy flew to Mississippi the place Linda and her new husband have been residing in a cushty house and he or she had gotten a job on the college.

“You knock on the door,” Schlesinger mentioned to McCarthy. “What’s her response?”

“Her response was … ‘I believed the investigation was throughout,'” he replied.

The investigation wasn’t over. McCarthy arrested Linda Duffey Gwozdz for homicide. And everybody was in for some surprises.

LINDA DUFFEY GWOZDZ GOES ON TRIAL

Six years after Linda Duffey shot her husband to dying, she thought she was happening along with her life with a brand new husband, a brand new home, a brand new look, and a brand new city. However now, she was happening trial for homicide.

“Sadly, on this explicit day, she was going to play with the gun once more like she’d accomplished so many occasions earlier than and he or she fast fired it into the highest of his head. It was a whole accident,” mentioned her lawyer, Joseph Low.

Low argued that, based mostly partly on the phrases of Elmer Fudd — “No extra buwwets” — Linda thought the .38 revolver was empty.

“Did you ever take into account the likelihood that this — what we’ll name a Bugs Bunny protection, for lack of a greater time period, may very well be true?” Schlesinger requested Prosecutor Lawyer Robert Villa.

“Zero % probability it is true,” he replied.

Robert Villa mentioned in 27 years on the job, he is by no means seen a protection rely even partly on a cartoon.

Watching a prosecutor parrot a bunny was a primary for “48 Hours” too, however an official transcript of the cartoon needed to be made.

“Bugs is having a dialog with Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd,” Villa defined earlier than studying the transcript. “‘What are you aware, no extra buwwets.’ After which Bugs Bunny says ‘No extra buwwets?’

“As they’re having this dialog, simply as she was about to fan fireplace the gun, he laid down and put his personal head proper in entrance of the gun,” Villa mentioned of Linda’s account. “It is so ridiculous.”

“You already know and I do know, unusual issues do occur,” Schlesinger famous.

“Unusual issues occur. This wasn’t one in all them,” Villa replied. “He was asleep. She shot him within the head twice.”

“It was that straightforward, open and shut?” Schlesinger requested.

“For me, it was,” mentioned Villa.

Nevertheless it wasn’t so easy for the jury. Over two weeks they heard three recordings of Linda’s statements to authorities about cartoon rabbits and cowboy fan firing. Additionally they heard days of testimony from dueling forensics consultants about whether or not Linda’s rationalization made any sense in any respect. It was quite a bit for the jury to contemplate.

“It was troublesome,” juror Brandie Jones mentioned. “For each professional there’s one other one who can let you know a unique story.”

The protection questioned whether or not prosecution professional witness Paul Delhauer was actually an professional in any respect. The jurors deliberated for a day, however couldn’t attain a verdict.

“Only a few of us thought the intent was there,” Jones mentioned. “So how do you convict any individual when it might have occurred precisely the way in which she defined it?”

With a deadlocked jury, the choose had no alternative and needed to declare a mistrial.

“It sends a transparent message that the jury wasn’t keen to convict on homicide,” mentioned protection lawyer Joseph Low.

“Had been you dissatisfied?” Schlesinger requested Prosecutor Villa.

“I am at all times dissatisfied when there is no verdict, as a result of which means I’ve to do it once more,” he replied.

And roughly one 12 months later, with Linda having remained in jail, Villa was doing it once more. This time his case could be very totally different – streamlined and easy.

“He laid down on the sofa,” Villa addressed the courtroom in his opening. “His spouse got here as much as him, put a gun between one and 7 inches from his head, and pulled the set off. …A while glided by. She pulled the set off once more.”

He mentioned the Duffey’s marriage was strained and Linda thought she may need to care for her ailing husband.

“She’s like, ‘I am not gonna wait on this man for the remainder of his life,'” Villa instructed Schlesinger.

“This was a premeditated and deliberate homicide,” he instructed the courtroom.

For his opening arguments, protection lawyer Joseph Low introduced his personal couch to the courtroom to current this as a easy case.

“No motive, no intent, no crime,” he instructed the courtroom. “Pat was her greatest good friend, and he or she was his. … One of many issues they cherished to do is to observe cartoons collectively… They have been kinda goofy.”

However there are various facets to this trial which might be, if you’ll, offbeat.

Decide John Torribio has a repute for lightening the ambiance for the jury.

“One in all you requested the clerk about how the cameras work. Effectively, they’re solely on me,” Decide Torribio joked to the jurors, who laughed in response. “I am the star, so don’t be concerned.”

However issues rapidly acquired severe when the district lawyer took jurors again to the second proper after Linda Duffey shot her husband:

Linda Duffey to 911: My husband was going to go taking pictures and he was exhibiting me how you can use a gun and I shot him. … He mentioned there have been no bullets within the gun! …I believed that is what he instructed me.

“It is onerous to make out among the phrases ‘trigger she will be able to’t even speak,” Low instructed jurors about Lind;a 911 name to police.

“She sounds terrified and frantic to me. What does she sound prefer to you?” Schlesinger requested Villa.

“She seems like somebody who’s appearing,” he replied.

Utilizing the firearm to show, Tracy Peck instructed the jury Linda needed to pull the set off on the gun twice to get two bullets to fireside.

“If I don’t launch the set off, the cylinder is not going to advance,” she testified.

The large shock on this trial is what prosecutor Robert Villa leaves out.

“I ask that individuals’s reveals 1 by way of 35 be admitted into proof, and with that I relaxation,” he instructed the courtroom.

“I rested my case after principally two-and-a-half days,” he instructed Schlesinger.

In contrast to the primary trial, there was little or no dense forensic testimony about blood stains and, most crucially, he didn’t introduce Linda’s taped interviews with police, the place she first mentioned Bugs Bunny.

“There was no want for Bugs Bunny,” Schlesinger famous to Villa.

“No want, except she took the stand,” he mentioned.

Villa has thrown protection lawyer Joseph Low a curve ball. Because the protection is not allowed to introduce the police interrogations except the State does first, the one approach jurors will hear Linda’s facet of the story is that if she takes the stand and exposes herself to cross examination.

“Had been you hoping she would take the stand?” Schlesinger requested.

“Completely,” Villa replied.

“Had been you prepared?”

“Completely.”

Low started his protection with a very good offense. His first witness was the detective who at first didn’t assume Linda was a murderess:

Joseph Low: Once you’re accomplished asking her questions, you allowed Mrs. Duffey to go house.

Lt. Shaun McCarthy: Appropriate.

“Speaking to her … was very convincing to me,” McCarthy instructed Schlesinger. “She was eccentric and, how might she hurt anyone?”

Joseph Low: You wouldn’t let any individual who you thought had simply dedicated a homicide return out on the road … Is not that appropriate, sir?

Robert Villa: Objection, relevance.

Decide Torribio: Sustained.

“That night time I favored her. Because the investigation went on, I favored her quite a bit much less,” mentioned McCarthy.

Low tried to color a sympathetic image of Linda by calling her sons to the stand.

“She’s a really emotional, caring individual,” Thomas Duffey testified.

“We have been at all times actually blissful,” Sean Duffey instructed the courtroom. “They favored cartoons quite a bit. They have been at all times making humorous jokes to one another … at all times poked enjoyable at one another and stuff.”

The protection has a really massive resolution to make: will Linda take the stand herself?

“And if she took the stand, we have been gonna hear all about Bugs Bunny,” mentioned Villa.

Linda determined to not take the stand. Anxious that the jury will hear nothing about fan firing, her lawyer comes up with an thought.

“I would prefer to refer the courtroom and counsel to web page 5 of the 911 transcript,” Low addressed the courtroom.

He discovered a reference to it within the 911 tape prosecutors have already launched.

“A very long time in the past he confirmed me how you can pull the factor again on the highest of the gun and pull the set off it quick,” the Decide Torribio learn aloud.

So Low is allowed to name firearms professional Lance Martini, who mentioned fan firing a double-action gun like Linda claims she did is not so far-fetched in any case.

Lance Martini: This may be accomplished. It is not overly widespread, however it definitely will be accomplished.

Joseph Low: Is it humanly attainable to shoot a couple of spherical in lower than a second? Double-action mode?

Lance Marini: Sure it’s.

“There isn’t any approach, completely no approach that it occurred that approach,” Villa instructed Schlesinger.

In his closing, Villa instructed jurors, “This was an execution.”

The jurors in Linda’s second trial by no means acquired to see any cartoons, however they did see an animation produced by the prosecutor. It’s no laughing matter; it makes an attempt to reply a lethal severe query: what occurred to Patrick Duffey?

The video animation of a lady taking pictures her husband within the head twice does not go away a lot to creativeness, though the protection, in closing arguments, mentioned it and the remainder of the State’s case are all a fantasy.

“She unintentionally shot her husband,” Low instructed the courtroom. “It ain’t proper, it isn’t truthful to guess any individual right into a conviction, guess any individual right into a concrete tomb.”

“All of it comes down as to whether it is one phrase or two phrases from the jury,” Schlesinger commented to Villa. “Responsible or not responsible.”

“Appropriate,” he replied.

A TALE OF TWO JURIES

It has been a protracted highway – now practically seven years since Patrick Duffey died and one 12 months after a jury deadlocked in his spouse’s first homicide trial. This time, the jury got here again in simply over 24 hours:

“We the jury above and titled motion discover the defendant Linda Doreen Gwozdz responsible of the crime of second-degree homicide…”

The responsible verdict floored Linda, who collapsed whereas leaving the courtroom. It hit her lawyer onerous, too; he waved off the digicam. For his half, the prosecutor is extra relieved than anything.

“I am happy that I haven’t got to strive it a 3rd time,” Villa mentioned.

“You noticed how she reacted,” Schlesinger commented to Villa.

“Sure,” he mentioned. “I’ve at all times thought she was an actress, so, that was her second.”

Patrick Duffey’s sister, Katherine Hunt, has waited years for today.

“That is the primary time I noticed her actually cry,” she mentioned following the decision. “She did not get away with murdering my brother.”

When it got here time to condemn Linda three months later, it was her final probability to deal with the courtroom:

“I needed to let all of you know the way grieved I really feel. Most of all to Patrick and — my lovely sons, Sean and Thomas, since you misplaced such a loving fantastic father,” she mentioned.

Her sons strive their greatest to ask for leniency.

“If there’s something you are able to do to assist out with my household,” Sean Duffey mentioned in courtroom, “that is all I can ask.”

“I consider she’s harmless, and I’ll till the day I die,” Thomas Duffey instructed the choose.

Linda’s second husband, Larry Gwozdz, additionally appealed to the choose.

“To say that this was a premeditated purposeful act, I am sorry. It is unacceptable to me,” he mentioned.

“Have a look at these two folks, fantastically in love,” Gwozdz continued, shakily holding up a photograph of himself and Linda. “Why? As a result of she’s an exquisite human being … who does not deserve this.”

However the choose does not have a lot leeway.

“On this explicit occasion the legislation mandates 40 to life, and my oath requires that I impose that,” he mentioned.

“48 Hours” discovered it curious that one jury couldn’t agree on a verdict in any respect and a second jury convicted Linda in a day. It’s ironic, however in these two trials it is apparently true, that, within the case towards Linda Duffey Gwozdz, much less was extra.

“48 Hours” sat down with jurors from each trials to see why one jury rapidly reached a verdict, whereas the opposite by no means did.

Keep in mind, the jury that convicted Linda solely heard the naked bones prosecution — little or no about fan firing or cartoons.

“They heard much more than you heard,” Schlesinger commented to the jurors from the second trial.

“And we will solely make the choice based mostly off of the proof that we heard,” mentioned juror Danielle Wong.

The jurors from each trials — those who heard the lengthy story and those who heard it made quick — sat round our desk and contemplated: whereas much less could also be extra, is it sufficient?

“You are placing a lady away for the remainder of her life, so current every part,” mentioned Brandie Jones, a juror within the first trial, who voted not responsible.

“I feel I actually need to agree with Brandie. Possibly all of the proof ought to be offered,” mentioned Wong.

“Do you know she gave an interview to police?” Schlesinger requested.

“Uh-uh,” Wong replied, shaking her head “no.”

“Would you’ve favored to?” Schlesinger requested.

“I’d have cherished to listen to what she needed to say. Would which have modified my resolution? Do not know. Probably,” Wong replied.

“In the event you had heard every part … do you assume it will have affected the deliberations?” Schlesinger requested.

“Completely,” mentioned Wong.

And regardless that they made their resolution, among the jurors who convicted Linda nonetheless have questions.

“Did it hassle you that they by no means mentioned precisely why she did it?” Schlesinger requested.

“Um, yeah, it did,” mentioned Wong.

“How’d you recover from that?”

“I am not over it. I nonetheless wanna know!” she replied.

“Once I heard the responsible verdict, I mentioned, ‘Yay, justice is lastly served,” mentioned Julie Prendergast.

Prendergast has little question the second jury did the proper factor by discovering her former good friend responsible. And he or she wonders how Linda’s life, which was as soon as so blissful, grew to become so unhappy.

“I am unhappy for everybody concerned … These two boys misplaced their father. And now, they’re dropping their mom,” she mentioned. “It is a tragic story … in each approach you possibly can give it some thought.”

---