‘ED crossing all limits’: Supreme Court docket raps probe company over TASMAC raids

‘ED crossing all limits’: Supreme Court docket raps probe company over TASMAC raids

Could 22, 2025 12:19 PM IST

The highest courtroom expressed robust disapproval of the company’s actions, stating that the ED was “crossing all limits.”

The Supreme Court docket on Wednesday stayed the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) cash laundering investigation towards Tamil Nadu’s state-run liquor retailer, TASMAC, amid allegations that the central company was overstepping its jurisdiction. 

Supreme courtroom exhibits robust disaproval of ED’s actions in TASMAC probe(ANI)

The highest courtroom expressed robust disapproval of the company’s actions, stating that the ED was “crossing all limits.” The courtroom remarked that the ED gave the impression to be violating the federal precept, “how can it raid TASMAC,” requested SC.

The courtroom was listening to the Tamil Nadu authorities’s plea towards ED raids on state-run liquor retailer TASMAC.

The Tamil Nadu authorities has approached the Supreme Court docket difficult ED’s raids on the premises of TASMAC. The state has contested the April 23 ruling by the Madras Excessive Court docket, which dismissed petitions filed by each the federal government and TASMAC and allowed the ED to proceed its investigation underneath the Prevention of Cash Laundering Act (PMLA).

What the Madras HC ruling mentioned

TASMAC and the Tamil Nadu authorities had approached the Madras Excessive Court docket difficult the Enforcement Directorate’s raids on the liquor retailer’s premises on March 6 and eight. Nevertheless, the excessive courtroom dismissed their petitions, stating that cash laundering was “against the law towards the folks of the nation.”

The courtroom termed the state’s arguments over alleged harassment of its officers as “insufficient and extremely disproportional” when weighed towards “the rights of tens of millions of individuals of the nation.” 

On authorities’s argument of ED’s motion being politically motivated, the HC rejected vendetta cost, asking whether or not a courtroom might assess “political forces at play” or change into a “partaker within the political sport.”

The courtroom additionally cautioned that accepting such claims of harassment bu investigation businesses might open the “floodgate of litigations” from residents difficult each lawful investigative process. 

The Madras HC additional dismissed the notion that prior consent from the state authorities was obligatory for searches, calling it “fully illogical and bereft of conscience.” 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *