EPA places 139 workers on go away after they publicly criticized Trump’s environmental insurance policies
The Environmental Safety Company has positioned 139 workers on go away after they signed a letter criticizing the Trump administration’s environmental insurance policies.
The letter, titled a “Declaration of Dissent,” accuses the Trump administration of undermining the EPA’s mission of defending the setting by selling “dangerous deregulation” and displaying”disregard for scientific experience.”
The doc, which was launched publicly on Monday and which acquired 620 signatures, outlines a number of areas of concern. These embrace adjustments to the EPA’s analysis and improvement practices and cuts to its environmental justice initiatives, which offer funding to help susceptible communities.
“Since January 2025, federal employees throughout the nation have been denigrated and dismissed based mostly on false claims of waste, fraud and abuse,” the letter states. “In the meantime, Individuals have witnessed the unraveling of public well being and environmental protections within the pursuit of political benefit.”
Below EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, the company has reduce funding for environmental enhancements in minority communities and has vowed to roll again federal laws that decrease air air pollution in nationwide parks and tribal reservations.
An EPA spokesperson confirmed that 139 EPA staffers have been positioned on administrative go away after signing the letter utilizing their official titles and company positions.
The spokesperson mentioned in a press release to CBS Information that the company has a “zero-tolerance coverage for profession bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging and undercutting the administration’s agenda as voted for by the good folks of this nation final November.”
Workers had been notified that they’d been positioned in a “non permanent, non-duty, paid standing” for the following two weeks, pending an investigation, in accordance with a replica of the e-mail obtained by the Related Press. “It is necessary that you just perceive that this isn’t a disciplinary motion,” the e-mail mentioned.
In accordance with Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science journal, greater than 170 EPA workers signed the letter, whereas one other 100 signed anonymously out of concern of retaliation.
The EPA responded to the workers’ letter earlier this week by saying coverage selections “are a results of a course of the place Administrator Zeldin is briefed on the newest analysis and science” by company employees.
contributed to this report.
