‘He and I – Firstpost
&w=1200&resize=1200,0&ssl=1)
Mamta Kulkarni and Vicky Goswami have been concerned in a serious controversy after they have been named because the accused in a Rs 2000-crore drug case
learn extra
Mamta Kulkarni, who shared display house with Aamir Khan, Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan in movies like Baazi and Karan Arjun, grabbed the limelight for all of the unsuitable causes. The veteran actress, who returned to just lately returned to Mumbai after 25 years, just lately revealed that she is just not married to Vicky Goswami.
“I’m not married to Vicky, he’s not my husband. I’m nonetheless single. I’ve not married anybody. Vicky and I’ve had a relationship however I blocked him 4 years in the past,” Mamta advised CNN-News18.
“Vicky is an effective man, he has a superb coronary heart. Everybody from the movie business used to go to him, so I additionally went to satisfy him. However I used to be additionally the final particular person from the movie business to satisfy Vicky. After I got here to find out about his fact, I left him. He was in Dubai jail. I began meditating to get him out of jail. Vicky got here out of jail in 2012. I met him in 2016. After that, he was arrested once more. He’s my previous now. I’ve left him,” the actress added.
Mamta and Vicky Goswami have been concerned in a serious controversy after they have been named because the accused in a Rs 2000-crore drug case. She was given a clear chit by the Bombay Excessive Courtroom.
They seen that the proceedings towards her have been manifestly frivolous and vexatious and continuation of the identical can be nothing in need of abuse of the method of court docket.
A division bench of Justices Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande in an order, a replica of which was made out there, mentioned it was of the “clear opinion” that the fabric collected towards Kulkarni doesn’t prima facie represent any offence towards her. “We’re happy that the continuation of the prosecution towards the petitioner (Kulkarni) can be nothing in need of abuse of strategy of court docket,” the bench mentioned in its order.
The court docket mentioned it was happy that this was a match case to train its inherent powers to quash the FIR because the proceedings are “manifestly frivolous and vexatious”. Kulkarni had filed a petition for quashing of the FIR lodged towards her in 2016 by the Thane police underneath varied provisions of the Narcotic Medication and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.