&w=1200&resize=1200,0&ssl=1 "Trump warns Israeli strike on Iran ‘may very effectively occur,’ urges harder talks over nuclear standoff")
Indian billionaire publicly backs Vijay Mallya: ‘Why is he nonetheless a political punching bag?’ | Trending
Jun 06, 2025 09:23 AM IST
In a latest podcast with Raj Shamani, Vijay Mallya claimed that he has paid all of the financial institution loans and has proof to show that.
Vijay Mallya, going through fraud and cash laundering expenses in India, claimed that the banks had recovered ₹14,100 crores from him whereas reacting to a publish shared by Indian billionaire Harsh Goenka. In his publish, Mallya thanked Goenka for talking in his favour, including that he has been going through “blatant discrimination”.
“Vijay Mallya lived the excessive life, sure. Defaulted, sure. In contrast to most others, his ₹9,000+ crore dues are actually reportedly settled,” Harsh Goenka wrote.
He added, “In the meantime, greater defaulters stroll free with a lot fatter haircuts from banks. If dues stay, the banks ought to clearly say so. If not, why is he nonetheless a political punching bag? Justice should be honest, not selective.”
How did Vijay Mallya react?
The previous proprietor of Kingfisher Airways and Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) wrote, “Thanks Harsh. The Union Finance Ministry has confirmed in writing that Banks have recovered ₹14,100 crores from me in opposition to a DRT judgement debt of ₹6,203 crores. Why the blatant discrimination?” Following this, Goenka responded with a folded palms emoticon.
Social media is split:
Whereas some supported Goenka’s publish, others had questions concerning the allegations in opposition to Mallya. One particular person requested, “If true, then what’s stopping Vijay Mallya from returning to India?”
One other remarked, “I agree. I learn that he has cleared all dues.” A 3rd commented, “Repaying dues doesn’t erase Mallya’s crimes— ₹900Cr IDBI mortgage fraud, cash laundering, & fleeing justice in 2016. CBI says he purchased ₹330Cr properties whereas Kingfisher bled. Justice isn’t selective; it’s incomplete till he faces court docket for his actions, not simply his money owed.” A fourth wrote, “He ought to face the regulation of the land.”
