Intel calls out Nvidia and AMD over safety flaws in new trade report – Firstpost
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4cc9/f4cc996d1ea68f0eaa14364938a9079f13b17444" alt="Intel calls out Nvidia and AMD over safety flaws in new trade report – Firstpost Intel calls out Nvidia and AMD over safety flaws in new trade report – Firstpost"&w=1200&resize=1200,0&ssl=1)
Intel was notably vital of AMD, stating that they’d 4.4 occasions extra firmware vulnerabilities in its {hardware} root-of-trust and 1.8 occasions extra vulnerabilities. Intel’s additionally acknowledged NVIDIA had reported 18 high-severity vulnerabilities, with 13 of them categorized as distant code execution flaws
learn extra
Intel has taken a direct shot at its largest rivals, AMD and NVIDIA, accusing them of main safety shortcomings of their chips. In its not too long ago launched 2024 Product Safety Report, the corporate not solely detailed the way it handles vulnerabilities in its personal merchandise but additionally highlighted the safety flaws present in rival {hardware}. Based on Intel, each AMD and NVIDIA have important safety points—a few of which don’t have any deliberate fixes.
The annual report, now in its sixth yr, serves as Intel’s manner of showcasing its dedication to safety. The corporate claimed that nearly all the vulnerabilities present in its {hardware} final yr—96 per cent—had been found internally, demonstrating its proactive method to safety. However after praising its personal safety efforts, Intel turned the highlight on its rivals, calling out AMD and NVIDIA for what it sees as main failings.
AMD beneath hearth for unfixed vulnerabilities
Intel was notably vital of AMD’s safety monitor document, stating that its competitor had 4.4 occasions extra firmware vulnerabilities in its {hardware} root-of-trust and 1.8 occasions extra vulnerabilities in its confidential computing applied sciences when in comparison with Intel’s personal {hardware}.
The report additionally identified that AMD had solely recognized 57 per cent of platform vulnerabilities in its personal chips, suggesting a scarcity of thorough inside safety analysis.
Maybe essentially the most regarding declare was that AMD has 78 recognized safety flaws with no deliberate fixes. If true, this may elevate critical issues for companies and customers counting on AMD’s chips, notably for delicate functions that require sturdy safety assurances.
NVIDIA’s safety woes
NVIDIA wasn’t spared both. Intel’s report acknowledged that NVIDIA had reported 18 high-severity vulnerabilities, with 13 of them categorized as distant code execution flaws—a sort of safety concern that enables hackers to take management of a system remotely.
In contrast, Intel claimed its personal GPUs had solely 10 reported safety points, with only one categorized as a extreme bug. The corporate used this as proof to argue that its graphics options are safer than NVIDIA’s, an necessary declare on condition that Intel has been attempting to carve out a much bigger share of the GPU market, which NVIDIA presently dominates.
Rivalry at play
Whereas Intel’s findings paint a damning image of its rivals, studies like these ought to all the time be considered with some scepticism. Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA are fierce rivals within the semiconductor trade, every competing for dominance in several areas.
Intel stays the chief within the CPU market, however AMD has been closing the hole. In Q3 2024, AMD elevated its market share by 5.7 per cent, chipping away at Intel’s long-standing dominance. In the meantime, NVIDIA continues to reign supreme within the GPU market, leaving Intel struggling to realize traction regardless of launching its Gaudi 3 AI chip. Intel’s latest try and problem NVIDIA fell flat, because it did not hit its goal and was pressured to cancel its next-gen Falcon Shores GPU lineup.
Given the aggressive panorama, Intel’s safety report might be seen as a strategic transfer to focus on its strengths whereas undermining confidence in AMD and NVIDIA. Nevertheless, if its claims about unresolved vulnerabilities maintain true, each firms can have some critical safety issues to handle.