Japan’s farm minister stated he has by no means had to purchase rice. That value him his job

Japan’s farm minister Taku Eto stepped down on Wednesday, home media reported, following public outrage over his feedback on getting free rice.
Eto stated Sunday that he has by no means had to purchase rice as he obtained ample quantities of the grain as items from supporters — a remark that struck a nerve with locals fighting rocketing costs of the beloved staple.
Japan has been grappling with hovering rice costs for months as inclement climate and the nation’s long-held coverage to guard native farmers’ pursuits crimps provides.
Taku’s resignation comes at a time when Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s authorities has been grappling with low approval rankings forward of a pivotal Higher Home election this summer season and ongoing tariff negotiations with the U.S. NHK World reported that former Atmosphere Minister Koizumi Shinjiro will succeed Eto.
Ishiba’s cupboard approval score has dropped to an all-time low of 27.4%, as voters develop more and more discontent with the administration’s failure to deal with hovering rice costs and rejection of consumption tax cuts in response to rising inflation, in accordance with a Kyodo Information ballot launched Sunday.
Whereas Japan’s agriculture ministry has been attempting to curb hovering costs by releasing authorities stockpiles, the transfer has had little impact in reining in costs.
Rice costs in round 1,000 supermarkets nationwide reportedly climbed to an all-time excessive within the week ending Could 11. Costs for a 5-kilogram bag of rice rose 54 yen week-on-week to 4,268 yen ($29.63).
“Following Japan’s rice scarcity and subsequent excessive costs in summer season 2024, costs have continued to soar, regardless of the arrival of the brand new home crop and report imports,” the U.S. Division of Agriculture stated in a March report.
The spike in rice costs displays the lingering results of poor harvests final yr, with home rice consumption being overwhelmingly supported by native manufacturing slightly than imports, stated HSBC’s chief Asia economist Frederic Neumann.
Straining the provision facet concern is the truth that rice in Japan is produced principally by aged individuals operating small farms, so that they’re not very environment friendly, stated Sayuri Shirai, a professor of economics beneath Keio College’s college of coverage administration, who added that the variety of farmers can be dropping with the growing old inhabitants.
“Japanese like Japanese rice. They don’t actually like international rice,” she stated.
Japan’s rice financial system stays pretty remoted from the world market, with stiff duties on imported rice aimed toward defending its rice farmers.
To make issues worse, demand for Japanese rice has skyrocketed on the again of excessive vacationer footfall, the professor famous.
The sharp enhance in rice costs can be partly attributable to panic-driven hoarding by each households and companies, stated Takuji Okubo, chief economist of the Japan Threat Discussion board.
Whereas some retailers introduced plans to import rice, unfamiliarity with imported rice amongst each shoppers and companies makes it unlikely that such imports will meaningfully alleviate the supply-demand imbalance, he informed CNBC.
Japan’s inflation rose 3.6% yr on yr in March. Though the determine was decrease than the three.7% seen in February, it nonetheless marked three straight years that the headline inflation determine has remained above the Financial institution of Japan’s 2% goal.
“That may be very excessive in comparison with the U.S. or Europe,” stated Shirai, who added that Japan’s inflation image has extra to do with value pressures which can be principally derived from meals costs.
“That’s the reason a variety of shoppers are very indignant,” Shirai stated.
Moreover, a budget yen additionally makes meals imports costly, she famous.
Japan imports about 60% of its meals provide, in accordance with meals sourcing and information hub Tridge. The nation has a meals self-sufficiency fee of 38%, in contrast with the federal government’s goal of 45% by fiscal 2030.