Justice Division is investigating NYC mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo over testimony to Congress

WASHINGTON — The Justice Division is conducting a felony investigation into former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a number one contender within the New York Metropolis mayoral race, over testimony he gave to Congress final yr, in accordance with an individual conversant in the matter.

Home Republicans had requested a federal investigation into Cuomo, arguing the New York Democrat lied to the Home Oversight Committee in 2024 when he stated he had not been concerned in reviewing a report from the New York Division of Well being concerning the state’s dealing with of the coronavirus pandemic from when he was governor.

A Justice Division spokesperson declined to remark Tuesday evening. The New York Instances first reported on the investigation.

Cuomo’s mayoral marketing campaign didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

Observe stay politics protection right here

The probe was launched by the U.S. Lawyer’s Workplace for the District of Columbia earlier than Ed Martin was changed as interim lawyer by former Fox Information host Jeanine Pirro, in accordance with the individual conversant in the matter.

Martin, who revealed on his final day in workplace that he’s going through an investigation by D.C.’s Workplace of Disciplinary Counsel, stated final week that he deliberate to “disgrace” individuals who the Justice Division didn’t cost with crimes — a serious departure from DOJ protocol.

Early in Trump’s second time period, a number of Justice Division officers resigned over the dealing with of a federal case in opposition to New York Metropolis Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who’s now looking for re-election as an impartial.

Trump administration officers needed the corruption case in opposition to Adams dropped after he started cooperating with the Trump administration on immigration enforcement. Then-Appearing Deputy Lawyer Normal Emil Bove stated the felony investigation was hampering Adams’ capability to deal with “unlawful immigration and violent crime.”

A federal decide final month completely dismissed the costs in opposition to Adams, saying potential future expenses could not be used as “leverage” over him.