Rachel Reeves: No issues raised with me about my bills

Rachel Reeves: No issues raised with me about my bills

Billy Kenber

Political investigations correspondent

Becky Morton

Political reporter

PA Media Chancellor Rachel Reeves PA Media

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has mentioned no issues had been raised together with her about her bills throughout her time working at Halifax Financial institution of Scotland.

A BBC Information investigation discovered that whereas at HBOS, Reeves was topic to an in depth whistleblowing criticism which raised issues about her use of firm cash.

Reeves mentioned she “submitted and had her bills signed off within the correct approach”.

Nevertheless, the BBC has seen paperwork which present issues about spending habits within the division Reeves labored in had been raised together with her.

A spokesman for the chancellor beforehand mentioned she had no information of the investigation, all the time complied with bills guidelines and left the financial institution on good phrases.

Requested what her understanding of the investigation was, Reeves instructed the BBC: “Nobody ever raised any issues about my bills once I labored for Halifax Financial institution of Scotland.

“I submitted and had my bills signed off within the correct approach, as you’d anticipate.”

Pressed over why a few of her former colleagues had been conscious of an investigation, the chancellor mentioned: “I do not know what they’re saying and naturally none of them have gone on the document.

“However I used to be by no means questioned, by no means requested to pay again any bills.”

Reeves mentioned she was “actually pleased with the work that I did earlier than I grew to become an MP” however added: “In the long run, persons are going to evaluate me on the job that I am doing now as chancellor of the exchequer to develop the financial system and put more cash within the pockets of working individuals.”

A Fb group for former HBOS workers included a number of joking about Reeves’s bills spending and the actual fact she was investigated.

Within the late 2000s earlier than getting into politics, Reeves labored at HBOS as a senior supervisor.

The BBC has learnt that in her time on the financial institution issues had been raised about Reeves, and two different managers, utilizing the financial institution’s cash to “fund a life-style”.

The issues raised about Reeves’s spending included a £400 leaving meal for a colleague, a £49 purse for her PA and £152 spent on one other bag, together with some fragrance as a gift for her boss in a joint present with one other supervisor.

One of many different workers investigated was Reeves’s supervisor and the one who signed off her bills.

The financial institution’s inside audit division carried out the preliminary investigation and located there was proof bills guidelines appeared to have been damaged, a senior supply mentioned.

The BBC has not been in a position to set up what the ultimate consequence of the investigation was, or whether or not it reached a conclusion.

In late 2008, a memo was circulated to Reeves and others calling for tighter price controls.

It particularly raised issues about “spending on journey” and on company spending playing cards, together with Motivation playing cards which had been used to reward employees.

The proposals it laid out for enhancing price controls included month-to-month discussions with Reeves and one other supervisor to take a look at “claims, invoices, Thanks card use and stories”. That different supervisor was additionally a kind of subsequently investigated over their use of bills.

Individually, Reeves was emailed in mid-December 2008 by an HBOS worker who steered they need to give a presentation to boost consciousness of how a lot was being spent on taxis and on Motivation playing cards.

Reeves replied to say that she was undecided a “large evaluation” was wanted and he or she needed to see the papers earlier than they went any additional.

‘Very severe questions’ – Badenoch

The BBC investigation has additionally raised questions in regards to the accuracy of Reeves’s on-line CV on LinkedIn.

After she was accused of embellishing it final 12 months, her profile was then modified to explain her function at HBOS to “retail banking”, fairly than “economist” because it had mentioned beforehand.

The BBC has now established that she exaggerated her time on the Financial institution of England and left 9 months sooner than she had claimed on LinkedIn.

Reeves was on the Financial institution of England for 5 and a half years, however practically a 12 months of that was spent finding out for a Masters on the London Faculty of Economics.

As just lately as final 12 months, she mentioned she had spent “one of the best a part of a decade as an economist on the Financial institution of England”.

A spokeswoman for Reeves mentioned the dates on her CV had been inaccurate resulting from an administrative error by a member of the group and that Reeves had not seen it earlier than it had been printed.

Talking on Friday, Conservative chief Kemi Badenoch mentioned Reeves had “some very, very severe inquiries to reply”.

“Keir Starmer mentioned he was bringing in a authorities of integrity.

“Telling lies and untruths in your CV, bills fraud which is what the allegations are, are very severe issues. And I do assume [Reeves] wants to come back out and clarify what’s going on.”

The BBC investigation pertains to potential breaches of HBOS bills guidelines, not fraud.

On Thursday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer backed his chancellor, saying she had “handled any points that come up” from “a few years in the past”.

She has additionally been defended by Science Secretary Peter Kyle, who insisted she will be able to “completely” be trusted.

He claimed the BBC’s reporting had been “inaccurate”, including: “The pinnacle of HR at that financial institution at the moment says it is unfaithful, mentioned that she by no means, ever acquired a file on Rachel Reeves.

“And he or she says that earlier than she left the financial institution, there was no investigation that handed her desk. And he or she’s additionally mentioned if there was one, it could have handed her desk.”

Nevertheless, the BBC’s reporting did embody quotes from Jane Wayper, who was an HR enterprise associate, not head of HR as Kyle described her.

Wayper had instructed the BBC she “would have been made conscious of any investigation which concluded there was a case to reply”.

The BBC has not reported that the investigation reached a conclusion, or that there was a disciplinary course of.

Thin, red banner promoting the Politics Essential newsletter with text saying, “Get the latest political analysis and big moments, delivered straight to your inbox every weekday”. There is also an image of the Houses of Parliament.

65 thoughts on “Rachel Reeves: No issues raised with me about my bills

  1. Getting it call for punishment, like a copious would should
    So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Earliest, an AI is allowed a originative discipline to account from a catalogue of during 1,800 challenges, from construction figures visualisations and царствование безграничных вероятностей apps to making interactive mini-games.

    Certainly the AI generates the organize, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the edifice in a innocuous and sandboxed environment.

    To assign to how the assiduity behaves, it captures a series of screenshots from the beginning to the end of time. This allows it to corroboration seeking things like animations, sector changes after a button click, and other spry consumer feedback.

    In the definite, it hands to the school all this certification – the inbred at if till the cows come home, the AI’s encrypt, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to front as a judge.

    This MLLM ump isn’t fair giving a emptied мнение and as contrasted with uses a detailed, per-task checklist to gull the conclude across ten undreamed of metrics. Scoring includes functionality, possessor quarrel, and shy aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is unrepressed, in articulate together, and thorough.

    The pudgy without a incredulity is, does this automated beak rank allowances of hire charge incumbency honoured taste? The results proffer it does.

    When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard podium where existent humans distinguish on the choicest AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a elephantine with dispatch from older automated benchmarks, which not managed inartistically 69.4% consistency.

    On nadir of this, the framework’s judgments showed across 90% concurrence with all accurate salutary developers.
    https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *