Rishabh Pant vs Zaheer Khan: Explosive Dugout Change Sparks Controversy As Batting Order Chaos Unfolds
In what’s turning out to be a season of frustration for Rishabh Pant, the Lucknow Tremendous Giants (LSG) skipper as soon as once more discovered himself on the middle of a dramatic IPL second—this time not for his explosive strokeplay, however for an animated alternate with crew mentor Zaheer Khan simply earlier than a puzzling two-ball duck in opposition to Delhi Capitals (DC). The episode not solely raised questions on his position within the LSG batting order but in addition opened up a broader debate round management readability and crew techniques in high-pressure matches.
https://t.co/pSTn3lkScf pic.twitter.com/snbPkwAIwl
— sᴜɢᴀʀ (@Sugar_Sai_Gill) April 22, 2025
Pant’s Puzzling Entry at No.7 – A Captain Left Ready
In Tuesday evening’s conflict on the Ekana Cricket Stadium, LSG had been well-placed at 99/2 after 12 overs. However in a transfer that shocked followers and commentators alike, Pant was held again till the final over—ultimately strolling in at No.7 with simply two balls left to face.
His arrival was met with seen frustration, and inside seconds, he was again within the dugout—bowled by Mukesh Kumar after a failed swap hit try. The choice to delay his entry got here beneath quick scrutiny, particularly given the stakes and the poor type he is endured up to now this season: 106 runs in 8 innings, averaging 13.25 at a strike-rate of simply 96.36.
Zaheer Khan, Justin Langer, or Pant? Who Made the Name?
TV cameras caught a fiery dialogue between Pant and Zaheer Khan within the dugout even earlier than he took the sphere. The character of the animated chat fueled hypothesis in regards to the tactical name.
Was Pant’s late entry a part of a pre-planned technique devised by head coach Justin Langer and Zaheer Khan? Or was it Pant’s personal resolution gone mistaken?
Former cricketers Anil Kumble and Suresh Raina, on air in the course of the Hindi commentary, supplied sharp insights:
“Rishabh appears annoyed. It’s clear it wasn’t the appropriate name. He ought to’ve batted earlier. Was it his name or the coach’s? That frustration exhibits one thing is off,” mentioned Kumble.
Raina added,
“He most likely informed Zaheer, ‘I ought to’ve gone in earlier.’ You’ve bought 20 overs, and also you’re the captain. This late entry didn’t assist anybody.”
Missed Momentum and DC’s Dominance
LSG, regardless of an 87-run opening stand led by Aiden Markram, collapsed to 159/6 after a mid-innings stutter. DC, however, chased down the goal in simply 17.5 overs—powered by half-centuries from KL Rahul and Abhishek Porel.
Mukesh Kumar’s good 4/33 spell derailed LSG’s center order, and by the point Pant arrived on the crease, it was far too late for injury management.
Pant’s Publish-Match Reflection – A Trace of Remorse
When requested in regards to the batting order resolution, Pant defined that the thought was to experiment with match-ups and situations:
“The concept was to capitalise with Samad, then Miller. We bought caught on the wicket. We’ve bought to determine the appropriate mixture,” Pant mentioned.
His feedback, although diplomatic, hinted at inner confusion—a theme that’s more and more evident in LSG’s inconsistent marketing campaign.
