‘Sheesh Mahal’ Row: CM Home Go to Drama By AAP To Divert Consideration From Corruption, Says BJP | India Information
New Delhi: The BJP on Wednesday accused the AAP leaders of diverting consideration from the “corruption and irregularities” surrounding the “Sheesh Mahal”, and enacting drama of a go to to the bungalow whereas the mannequin code of conduct was applied for the upcoming Meeting polls.
“Why did AAP leaders Sanjay Singh and Saurabh Bharadwaj not go to the Sheesh Mahal earlier?”, questioned Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva after they had been stopped by the police from visiting the bungalow in Civil Strains, earlier within the day.
Singh on Sunday challenged the BJP for a go to to “Sheesh Mahal” and the Prime Minister’s residence dubbing it “Raj Mahal” together with media individuals.
Sachdeva charged, “The AAP leaders are doing drama and making an attempt to divert consideration from the Sheesh corruption and irregularities dedicated within the building of Sheesh Mahal (6, Flagstaff Street, occupied by Arvind Kejriwal as chief minister). Why did they not consider exhibiting the Sheesh Mahal earlier and now insist on a go to when the administration is sure by a mannequin code of conduct?”
The Delhi BJP president visited AB 17 Mathura Street bungalow allotted to Delhi Chief Minister Atishi. He requested, “Why is Atishi demanding one other bungalow when she was allotted this bungalow?”
Atishi on Tuesday alleged that the BJP-led Centre evicted her from the chief minister’s bungalow by cancelling allotment.
In response to the division, Atishi didn’t take possession of the property throughout the mandated time-frame.
“The allottee had didn’t take bodily possession/occupation of the bungalow at 6, Flag Employees Street, regardless of a number of requests/correspondences and even after issuance of ‘Habitability Certificates’ for the bungalow, certifying that the bungalow was match for fast occupation and absolutely liveable. Nevertheless, on this case, possession was not taken even after three months,” the PWD letter acknowledged.
The PWD has, in the meantime, provided two different bungalows to the chief minister.
Sachdeva stated, “Atishi ought to inform the individuals why didn’t she take possession of the Flagstaff Street bungalow inside three months, and now claiming that her allotment was cancelled”.
He additionally alleged that Atishi herself didn’t dwell at AB 17 Mathura Street bungalow and requested her to make clear who lived there.
“It’s the similar bungalow the place Sheila Dikshit lived as Delhi’s chief minister from 1998 to 2004. Why can Atishi not dwell in it?” he questioned.
Sachdeva alleged that the AAP leaders had been indulging in “petty politics” by elevating questions over the PM’s residence, to divert consideration from the notoriety gained by the “Sheesh Mahal”.
