Sukhbir Badal and SAD struggling for help, sympathy

With each pro-Sukhbir and anti-Sukhbir factions of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD)—together with dissidents like Sukhdev Singh Dhindsa, Prem Singh Chandumajra, and Jagir Kaur—submitting themselves to the Akal Takht, the way forward for the occasion stays unsure.

Will these factions unite to revive the occasion by way of democratic elections, or will some leaders break free to hitch the BJP or different political outfits?

One other key query is the ideological path SAD (B) will take following its submission to the Akal Takht. Will it rediscover its Panthic roots to guard its core vote financial institution from rising as “neo-panthic” forces, or will it proceed to perform as a centrist, catch-all occasion dedicated to the rules of “Punjab, Punjabi, and Punjabiyat”?

One other necessary query considerations the longer term position of the Akal Takht. Will it safeguard its newfound autonomy, remaining above routine politics, and supply ethical management to the neighborhood? Or was its latest assertion merely a brief phenomenon pushed by the decline of the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) and its personal lack of credibility?

As soon as the present disaster subsides, will the Akal Takht proceed to keep up its independence, or will it revert to taking part in second fiddle to politicians, legitimising doubtful political selections?