Tech companies, content material business debate AI, copyright at ministry of commerce occasion

Who owns the info that fuels synthetic intelligence (AI)? That was the central — and contentious — query debated by representatives from massive tech companies and the content material business throughout a two-day stakeholder session organised by the ministry of commerce and business’s division for promotion of business and inside commerce (DPIIT).
The conferences had been chaired by DPIIT extra secretary Himani Pande on June 19 and 20. On the centre of the dialogue was whether or not tech firms ought to be allowed to freely mine the web, which incorporates copyrighted books, articles, music, photographs, and movies, to coach their AI fashions.
The content material business raised considerations over their copyrighted knowledge getting used to coach AI fashions with out permission, whereas tech firms argued that coaching their fashions requires large quantities of knowledge—a lot of which is copyrighted.
The startups on the primary day urged the DPIIT to make sure a stage taking part in discipline, arguing that whereas they’re nonetheless within the early levels of constructing their AI fashions, bigger firms have already skilled theirs, typically with out dealing with the identical stage of regulatory scrutiny or restrictions, stated a participant from the tech meet on June 19.
A consultant from the Digital Information Publishers Affiliation (DNPA), who was current on the content material business assembly, stated, “DNPA firmly believes that utilising the content material of digital information publishers, with out consent, for AI coaching and subsequent generative AI purposes, equivalent to search help and data functions, constitutes an infringement of copyright.”
Additionally Learn: HC specialists differ in OpenAI copyright case
“The affiliation advocates for a regime that ensures truthful compensation for content material producers, recognising their rights within the digital panorama,” he added.
A stakeholder assembly for the content material business noticed creators fearful about being “strip-mined for knowledge,” a participant stated.
One of many key matters mentioned at each conferences was whether or not India ought to allow textual content and knowledge mining (TDM) underneath an opt-out framework. TDM is a method utilized by AI programs to scan and study from huge volumes of knowledge, together with textual content and pictures.
Additionally Learn: First assembly held on AI’s impression on India’s copyright framework
An alternate mechanism that got here up in the course of the assembly on Friday was whether or not a statutory licensing mechanism for AI coaching functions would possibly work, which includes permitting the usage of copyrighted works with out direct permission, offered firms pay a government-set payment and observe sure guidelines.
The DPIIT sought business enter on the copyright standing of AI-generated works—a difficulty additionally on the coronary heart of the ANI vs OpenAI case within the Delhi Excessive Court docket, the place the information company filed a lawsuit towards the ChatGPT creator for allegedly utilizing its articles to coach AI fashions.
“Who ought to be thought-about the precise proprietor of content material generated by AI? If a consumer places vital effort into crafting a immediate that results in a particular output, does that make the consumer the rightful proprietor or does the possession lie with the creators of the AI mannequin?” an individual representing an AI startup stated.
Additionally learn: Information for coaching saved abroad, copyright regulation doesn’t apply: OpenAI
These stakeholder conferences construct on the work of a nine-member DPIIT committee fashioned in April, which incorporates IP attorneys, business representatives, IT ministry officers, academicians, and DPIIT officers. Whereas the committee has been assembly frequently since Might 16, HT had earlier reported that one member expressed discomfort with being on the committee, saying they lacked AI experience.
The committee, which heard totally different views from the tech and content material industries in the course of the two-day assembly, will quickly publish a working paper outlining whether or not India’s copyright regulation must be up to date to handle challenges posed by AI.