What we learn about US air strikes on Iran’s nuclear amenities

BBC Information

President Donald Trump says the US has carried out a “profitable” bombing assault on three nuclear websites in Iran and stated they’ve been “obliterated”.
Israel says they had been in “full co-ordination” with the US in planning the strikes. Iranian officers have confirmed the amenities had been struck however denied it had suffered a serious blow.
The strikes mark a major escalation within the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel.
This is what we all know.
What has the US bombed, and what weapons did it use?
One of many targets was Fordo, a uranium enrichment plant hidden in a distant mountainside that’s very important to Iran’s nuclear ambitions. We don’t but know the complete scale of the injury on the facility.
The US says it additionally hit two different nuclear websites – at Natanz and Isfahan.

Hidden away in a mountainside south of Tehran, Fordo is believed to be deeper underground than the Channel Tunnel connecting the UK and France.
Resulting from Fordo’s depth beneath floor solely the US has the form of “bunker buster” bomb sufficiently big to destroy the location. That US bomb is known as the GBU-57 Large Ordnance Penetrator (MOP).
It weighs 13,000kg (30,000lb) and is ready to penetrate about 18m (60ft) of concrete or 61m (200ft) of earth earlier than exploding, in accordance with specialists.
Because of the depths of Fordo’s tunnels, the MOP isn’t assured to achieve success, however it’s the solely bomb that might come shut.
US media experiences say MOPs had been used within the strikes.

What is understood in regards to the influence of the assaults?
It’s unclear but what injury the US assault has had on the nuclear amenities, or whether or not there are any accidents or casualties.
The Iranian Atomic Power Group stated the bombing of the three nuclear websites was a “barbaric violation” of worldwide regulation.
Each Saudi Arabia and the UN’s nuclear watchdog the Worldwide Atomic Power Company (IAEA) say there was no improve in radiation ranges after the assault. IAEA chief Rafaelle Grossi has known as an emergency assembly of the organisation’s board of governors on Monday.
The deputy political director of Iran’s state broadcaster, Hassan Abedini, stated Iran had evacuated these three nuclear websites a “whereas in the past”.
Showing on state-run TV, he stated Iran “did not undergo a serious blow as a result of the supplies had already been taken out”.
In his televised handle, Trump stated the “nuclear enrichment amenities have been fully and completely obliterated”.
However talking on the BBC Information Channel, former US assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs Mark Kimmitt was extra circumspect.
“There is no option to recommend that it has been destroyed forever,” he stated.
Iran’s overseas minister has warned the US that its assault on Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz may have “eternal penalties.”
Abbas Araghchi stated Iran was reserving “all choices” to defend its sovereignty.
How would possibly Iran retaliate?
BBC safety correspondent Frank Gardner says Iran should now select between three strategic programs of motion in response to the US assault in a single day:
- Do nothing. This might spare it from additional US assaults. It might even select the diplomatic route and re-join negotiations with the US. However doing nothing makes the Iranian regime look weak, particularly in spite of everything its warnings of dire repercussions if the US did assault. It could resolve the danger of weakening its grip on its inhabitants outweighs the price of additional US assaults
- Retaliate exhausting and quick. Iran nonetheless has a considerable arsenal of ballistic missiles after manufacturing and hiding these away for years. It has a goal checklist of round 20 US bases to select from within the broader Center East. It might additionally launch “swarm assaults” on US Navy warships utilizing drones and quick torpedo boats
- Retaliate later at a time of its personal selecting. This may imply ready till the present rigidity has subsided and launching a shock assault when US bases had been now not on most alert
Iran might additionally goal the property of close by international locations it perceives to be aiding the US, which dangers the conflict spilling over to your complete area.
Throughout the hours of the US bombing, Iran launched a recent wave of missiles in direction of Israel. A number of elements of Tel Aviv in addition to the northern metropolis of Haifa had been hit – Israeli officers say at the very least 16 individuals have been injured.
What did Donald Trump say and the way have US politicians reacted?
Flanked by Vice President JD Vance, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump stated in his handle that future assaults can be “far larger” except Iran reached a diplomatic answer.
“Bear in mind, there are various targets left,” he stated.
A number of members of Trump’s Republican Celebration have posted statements in help of the transfer. Texas Senator Ted Cruz “counseled” the president, his administration and the US army concerned within the strikes.
Nonetheless, not each Republican is joyful. “This isn’t our struggle,” wrote congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Main US Democrat Hakeem Jeffries stated Trump risked US “entanglement in a doubtlessly disastrous conflict within the Center East”, whereas others have accused him of bypassing Congress to launch a brand new conflict.
Unbiased Senator Bernie Sanders described the US strikes as “grossly unconstitutional” because the president doesn’t have the only energy to formally declare conflict on one other nation. Solely Congress – lawmakers elected within the Home of Representatives and the Senate – can.
However the regulation additionally states that the president is the commander in chief of the armed forces. Which means he can deploy US troops and conduct army operations with no formal declaration of conflict.
How have world leaders reacted?
UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stated the US took motion to “alleviate” what he known as the “grave menace” posed by Iran’s nuclear programme. In a press release, he known as on Tehran to comply with talks and attain a diplomatic answer.
UN secretary basic Antonio Guterres stated the US air strikes had been a harmful escalation; whereas European Union overseas coverage chief Kaja Kallas urged all sides to step again and return to the negotiating desk.
Saudi Arabia has voiced “nice concern” whereas Oman – which has hosted US-Iran talks in latest weeks – condemned the strikes and known as for de-escalation.
How did this begin?
Israel launched a shock assault on dozens of Iranian nuclear and army targets on 13 June. It stated its ambition was to dismantle its nuclear programme, which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated would quickly have the ability to produce a nuclear bomb.
Iran insists its nuclear ambitions are peaceable. In retaliation, Tehran launched tons of of rockets and drones at Israel. The 2 international locations have continued exchanging strikes since, in an air conflict which has now lasted greater than per week.
Trump has lengthy stated that he’s against Iran possessing a nuclear weapon. Israel is broadly believed to have them, though it neither confirms nor denies this.
In March, US nationwide intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard stated that whereas Iran had elevated its uranium stockpile to unprecedented ranges, it was not constructing a nuclear weapon – an evaluation that Trump not too long ago stated was “fallacious”.
On the marketing campaign path, Trump had criticised previous US administrations for partaking in “silly infinite wars” within the Center East, and he vowed to maintain America out of overseas conflicts.
The US and Iran had been in nuclear talks on the time of Israel’s shock assault. Solely two days in the past, Trump stated he would give Iran two weeks to enter into substantial negotiations earlier than hanging – however that timeline turned out to be a lot shorter.