Why Muslim UK MP is going through backlash over views on trans rights – The Occasions of India

Why Muslim UK MP is going through backlash over views on trans rights – The Occasions of India

A Twitter trade between UK Labour MP Apsana Begum and YouTuber Mahyar Tousi has drawn public consideration following a landmark Supreme Courtroom ruling that defines “girl” within the Equality Act 2010 as strictly a organic feminine.
Reacting to the ruling, Begum wrote on X (previously Twitter), “Together with the trans neighborhood is crucial to making sure that everybody in society is equal. In opposition to the worldwide backdrop of accelerating assaults on trans individuals, rollbacks on their human rights & immediately’s courtroom ruling, now greater than ever earlier than we should present them dignity and security.”
Tousi replied with a pointed query: “Would you ship ‘trans girls’ to the male or feminine part of a mosque, Apsana?”—a response that triggered backlash and reignited debate over spiritual inclusion, trans rights, and gender identification in public areas.

The net spat got here simply hours after the UK’s Supreme Courtroom unanimously dominated that the phrases “girl” and “intercourse” within the Equality Act 2010 refer solely to organic girls. “The unanimous resolution of this courtroom is that the phrases ‘girl’ and ‘intercourse’ within the Equality Act 2010 discuss with organic girls and organic intercourse,” mentioned Deputy President of the Supreme Courtroom, Justice Patrick Hodge. “We counsel in opposition to studying this judgment as a triumph of a number of teams in our society on the expense of one other. It isn’t.”
The ruling is seen as a serious blow to trans rights campaigners, significantly in relation to entry to women-only areas corresponding to home violence shelters, hospital wards, and sports activities amenities. Authorized analysts say the judgement may additionally affect future authorized battles over equal pay, sex-segregated areas, and variety in hiring.
Whereas the courtroom reaffirmed that transgender people stay protected below the act, it clarified that their protections fall below “gender reassignment,” not “intercourse.” The case was introduced by the group For Girls Scotland (FWS), which challenged a Scottish authorities directive permitting trans girls with Gender Recognition Certificates (GRCs) to be counted as girls for public sector equality duties.
The ruling was welcomed by creator JK Rowling, a vocal FWS supporter, who mentioned, “This case has protected the rights of ladies and ladies throughout the UK.” In the meantime, LGBTQ+ organisations criticised the decision, warning that it may limit trans girls’s entry to very important providers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *