‘Will result in social instability in nation’: Asaduddin Owaisi’s warning on Waqf invoice

Throughout his speech within the Lok Sabha, Owaisi warned of “social instability within the nation”.

“I’m cautioning and warning this authorities – when you convey and make a Waqf regulation within the current type, which might be a violation of Article 25, 26 and 14, it would result in social instability on this nation. It has been rejected by your entire Muslim group. No Waqf property might be left, nothing might be left,” ANI quoted Owaisi as saying.

“You wish to make India ‘Viksit Bharat’, we would like ‘Viksit Bharat’. You wish to take this nation again to the ’80s and early ’90s, will probably be your duty,” he added.

“As a proud Indian Muslim, I cannot lose an inch of my Masjid…I cannot lose an inch of my Dargah. I cannot enable that. We’ll no extra come and provides a diplomatic speak over right here. That is the Home the place I’ve to face and converse truthfully, that my group – we’re proud Indians. It’s my property, not given by anybody. You can’t snatch it away from me. Waqf is a type of worship for me,” Owaisi stated.

Opposition MPs protest expunction of dissent notes on Waqf Invoice report

On Monday, opposition MPs Kalyan Banerjee and Md Nadimul Haque, protested the alleged expunction of key parts of their dissent notes submitted to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Waqf (Modification) Invoice.

In a letter addressed to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, the MPs alleged that their objections have been eliminated arbitrarily with out prior discover or rationalization.

“To our dismay and utter shock, we discovered that the next goals and dissent notes have been deleted by the Chairman with out informing us and with out our consent,” ANI quoted the the MPs’ letter.

ALSO READ: ‘Opposition submitted dissent notice on 281 of 428 web page report’: Waqf JPC chairman

The dissent notes, submitted after the draft report of the Waqf (Modification) Invoice was authorised with 14 members in favour and 11 towards, criticized the committee’s proceedings and proposals.

Banerjee and Haque alleged that the committee’s conclusions have been biased and predetermined. “The observations and/or suggestions are a obtrusive occasion of preconceived motions and views of the Chairperson and the members of the ruling occasion,” the letter said.